EH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -37.51% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of 0.04%. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 57.5%. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 103.13%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than EHang Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than EHang Holdings.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $17.9M, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.70x versus 0.43x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunrise New Energy has a net margin of -37.51% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77% beat Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 57.5%. On the other hand Sunrise New Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrise New Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrise New Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $17.9M, which are larger than Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M is higher than Sunrise New Energy's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrise New Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.70x versus 0.49x for Sunrise New Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -37.51% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 57.5%. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1285.08%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than EHang Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than EHang Holdings.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $17.9M, which are larger than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M is higher than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.70x versus 0.06x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -37.51% compared to EHang Holdings's net margin of --. EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

EHang Holdings has a consensus price target of $24.29, signalling upside risk potential of 57.5%. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, which suggesting that the stock is 5.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

EHang Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. EHang Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

EHang Holdings quarterly revenues are $17.9M, which are larger than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M is higher than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, EHang Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for EHang Holdings is 20.70x versus 0.06x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.