SLNH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bit Digital has a net margin of -95.55% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 35.41%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92% beat Bit Digital's return on equity of 9.49%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Bit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 202.73%. Given that Bit Digital has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Bit Digital is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, which suggesting that the stock is 259.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Digital has a beta of 6.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 505.209%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Bit Digital quarterly revenues of $81.8M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Bit Digital's net income of $29M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bit Digital's PE ratio is 7.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.07x versus 1.74x for Bit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -95.55% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 32.18%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $234.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.05%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, which suggesting that the stock is 259.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.4M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.07x versus 9.82x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -95.55% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of 95.71%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.77 which suggests that it could grow by 134.83%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, which suggesting that the stock is 259.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 20.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.07x versus 5.49x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -95.55% compared to Soluna Holdings's net margin of -83.45%. Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17%.

Soluna Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.06 which suggests that it could grow by 228.85%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, which suggesting that the stock is 259.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.172%.

Soluna Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Soluna Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $35M. Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M. Notably, Soluna Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Soluna Holdings is 0.07x versus 6.52x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.