WULF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleanspark has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -69.65%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Cleanspark's return on equity of 5.04%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 182.99%. On the other hand Cleanspark has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 158.74%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Cleanspark, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Cleanspark.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleanspark has a beta of 4.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 320.684%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleanspark offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleanspark pays out -2.35% of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Cleanspark quarterly revenues of $162.3M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Cleanspark's net income of $246.8M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleanspark's PE ratio is 67.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.02x versus 3.91x for Cleanspark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -51.55%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of --.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 182.99%. On the other hand Greenidge Generation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 353.98%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Greenidge Generation Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are larger than Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues of $12.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Greenidge Generation Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.02x versus 0.13x for Greenidge Generation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MARA Holdings has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -94.79%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat MARA Holdings's return on equity of 19.72%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 182.99%. On the other hand MARA Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $22.04 which suggests that it could grow by 78.04%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than MARA Holdings, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than MARA Holdings.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MARA Holdings has a beta of 5.951, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 495.066%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MARA Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MARA Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than MARA Holdings quarterly revenues of $214.4M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than MARA Holdings's net income of $528.5M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MARA Holdings's PE ratio is 9.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.02x versus 5.85x for MARA Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -83.45% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of 95.71%. TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

TeraWulf has a consensus price target of $9.06, signalling upside risk potential of 182.99%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.30 which suggests that it could grow by 117.61%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, which suggesting that the stock is 170.214% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.766%.

TeraWulf has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TeraWulf pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

TeraWulf quarterly revenues are $35M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, TeraWulf's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 23.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TeraWulf is 8.02x versus 6.11x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.