GREE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bit Digital has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of 35.41%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Bit Digital's return on equity of 9.49%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 369.26%. On the other hand Bit Digital has an analysts' consensus of $6.10 which suggests that it could grow by 171.11%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Bit Digital, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Bit Digital.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bit Digital has a beta of 5.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 413.155%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than Bit Digital quarterly revenues of $81.8M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Bit Digital's net income of $29M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bit Digital's PE ratio is 8.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.12x versus 1.95x for Bit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of 95.71%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 369.26%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.30 which suggests that it could grow by 118.99%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 335.766%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 22.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.12x versus 6.07x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stronghold Digital Mining has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -242.91%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Stronghold Digital Mining's return on equity of -83.83%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 369.26%. On the other hand Stronghold Digital Mining has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 113.52%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than Stronghold Digital Mining, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than Stronghold Digital Mining.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stronghold Digital Mining has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stronghold Digital Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stronghold Digital Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are larger than Stronghold Digital Mining quarterly revenues of $8M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is higher than Stronghold Digital Mining's net income of -$19.5M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stronghold Digital Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.12x versus 0.48x for Stronghold Digital Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of -51.55% compared to Greenidge Generation Holdings's net margin of -83.45%. Greenidge Generation Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -24.17%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 369.26%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.06 which suggests that it could grow by 211.19%. Given that Greenidge Generation Holdings has higher upside potential than TeraWulf, analysts believe Greenidge Generation Holdings is more attractive than TeraWulf.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.702, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 170.214%.

Greenidge Generation Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Greenidge Generation Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Greenidge Generation Holdings quarterly revenues are $12.4M, which are smaller than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $35M. Greenidge Generation Holdings's net income of -$6.4M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$29.2M. Notably, Greenidge Generation Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Greenidge Generation Holdings is 0.12x versus 7.30x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.