BGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 22.23%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 11.05%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $127.69 which suggests that it could grow by 3.44%. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.389%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 63.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $14.3B. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $3.2B. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.04x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 18.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.95x versus 3.65x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of -182.06%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 0.56%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $17.90 which suggests that it could grow by 54.84%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.145, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 314.543%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $84.8M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$154.4M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.04x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 57.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.95x versus 9.30x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of 17.53%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BGC Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe BGC Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.330, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.05%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.04x while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 11.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.95x versus 1.48x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TeraWulf has a net margin of 2.71% compared to BGC Group's net margin of -84.01%. BGC Group's return on equity of 12.78% beat TeraWulf's return on equity of -19.09%.

BGC Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 36.99%. On the other hand TeraWulf has an analysts' consensus of $9.94 which suggests that it could grow by 49.89%. Given that TeraWulf has higher upside potential than BGC Group, analysts believe TeraWulf is more attractive than BGC Group.

BGC Group has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.25% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TeraWulf has a beta of 2.541, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 154.119%.

BGC Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.8%. TeraWulf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BGC Group pays 47.93% of its earnings as a dividend. TeraWulf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BGC Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BGC Group quarterly revenues are $544.2M, which are larger than TeraWulf quarterly revenues of $27.1M. BGC Group's net income of $14.7M is higher than TeraWulf's net income of -$22.7M. Notably, BGC Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.04x while TeraWulf's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BGC Group is 1.95x versus 16.45x for TeraWulf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.