MIGI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MarketAxess Holdings has a net margin of -99.28% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of 32.18%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99% beat MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 20.42%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 617.7%. On the other hand MarketAxess Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $234.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.05%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.697, which suggesting that the stock is 269.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.679%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MarketAxess Holdings offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings pays out 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $12.3M, which are smaller than MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues of $202.4M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M is lower than MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $65.1M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MarketAxess Holdings's PE ratio is 29.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.13x versus 9.82x for MarketAxess Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of -99.28% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of 95.71%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of 4.26%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 617.7%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $16.77 which suggests that it could grow by 134.83%. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Riot Platforms, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Riot Platforms.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.697, which suggesting that the stock is 269.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 359.878%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $12.3M, which are smaller than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $142.6M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Riot Platforms's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 20.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.13x versus 5.49x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Siebert Financial has a net margin of -99.28% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of 17.53%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99% beat Siebert Financial's return on equity of 14.12%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 617.7%. On the other hand Siebert Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Siebert Financial, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Siebert Financial.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.697, which suggesting that the stock is 269.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Siebert Financial has a beta of 0.303, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.738%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Siebert Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Siebert Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $12.3M, which are smaller than Siebert Financial quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Siebert Financial's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Siebert Financial's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.13x versus 1.33x for Siebert Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Soluna Holdings has a net margin of -99.28% compared to Mawson Infrastructure Group's net margin of -95.55%. Mawson Infrastructure Group's return on equity of -315.99% beat Soluna Holdings's return on equity of -57.92%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 617.7%. On the other hand Soluna Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mawson Infrastructure Group has higher upside potential than Soluna Holdings, analysts believe Mawson Infrastructure Group is more attractive than Soluna Holdings.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a beta of 3.697, which suggesting that the stock is 269.725% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Soluna Holdings has a beta of 3.599, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.886%.

Mawson Infrastructure Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Soluna Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mawson Infrastructure Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Soluna Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mawson Infrastructure Group quarterly revenues are $12.3M, which are larger than Soluna Holdings quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Mawson Infrastructure Group's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Soluna Holdings's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Mawson Infrastructure Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Soluna Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mawson Infrastructure Group is 0.13x versus 0.07x for Soluna Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.