SGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cumulus Media has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Saga Communications's net margin of -5.07%. Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76% beat Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71%.

Saga Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 101.85%. On the other hand Cumulus Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1328.57%. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than Saga Communications, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than Saga Communications.

Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.987%.

Saga Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.46%. Cumulus Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Saga Communications pays 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Cumulus Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Saga Communications quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Cumulus Media quarterly revenues of $203.6M. Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M is higher than Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Saga Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.51x while Cumulus Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saga Communications is 0.65x versus 0.02x for Cumulus Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emmis has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Saga Communications's net margin of --. Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76% beat Emmis's return on equity of --.

Saga Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 101.85%. On the other hand Emmis has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Saga Communications has higher upside potential than Emmis, analysts believe Saga Communications is more attractive than Emmis.

Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emmis has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.325%.

Saga Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.46%. Emmis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Saga Communications pays 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Emmis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Saga Communications quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are larger than Emmis quarterly revenues of --. Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M is higher than Emmis's net income of --. Notably, Saga Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.51x while Emmis's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saga Communications is 0.65x versus 0.73x for Emmis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iHeartMedia has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Saga Communications's net margin of -4.09%. Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76% beat iHeartMedia's return on equity of --.

Saga Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 101.85%. On the other hand iHeartMedia has an analysts' consensus of $3.58 which suggests that it could grow by 68.23%. Given that Saga Communications has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, analysts believe Saga Communications is more attractive than iHeartMedia.

Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.919%.

Saga Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.46%. iHeartMedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Saga Communications pays 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend. iHeartMedia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Saga Communications quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than iHeartMedia quarterly revenues of $1B. Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M is higher than iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M. Notably, Saga Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.51x while iHeartMedia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saga Communications is 0.65x versus 0.08x for iHeartMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban One has a net margin of 4.51% compared to Saga Communications's net margin of -28.8%. Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76% beat Urban One's return on equity of -29.93%.

Saga Communications has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 101.85%. On the other hand Urban One has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Saga Communications has higher upside potential than Urban One, analysts believe Saga Communications is more attractive than Urban One.

Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, which suggesting that the stock is 74.005% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban One has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.016%.

Saga Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 13.46%. Urban One offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Saga Communications pays 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Urban One pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Saga Communications quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Urban One quarterly revenues of $110.4M. Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M is higher than Urban One's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, Saga Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.51x while Urban One's PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Saga Communications is 0.65x versus 0.16x for Urban One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.