IHRT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cumulus Media has a net margin of -4.09% compared to iHeartMedia's net margin of -5.07%. iHeartMedia's return on equity of -- beat Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71%.

iHeartMedia has a consensus price target of $3.58, signalling upside risk potential of 68.23%. On the other hand Cumulus Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1328.57%. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than iHeartMedia.

iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, which suggesting that the stock is 71.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.987%.

iHeartMedia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cumulus Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iHeartMedia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cumulus Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Cumulus Media quarterly revenues of $203.6M. iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M is lower than Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, iHeartMedia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cumulus Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia is 0.08x versus 0.02x for Cumulus Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emmis has a net margin of -4.09% compared to iHeartMedia's net margin of --. iHeartMedia's return on equity of -- beat Emmis's return on equity of --.

iHeartMedia has a consensus price target of $3.58, signalling upside risk potential of 68.23%. On the other hand Emmis has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iHeartMedia has higher upside potential than Emmis, analysts believe iHeartMedia is more attractive than Emmis.

iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, which suggesting that the stock is 71.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emmis has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.325%.

iHeartMedia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emmis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. iHeartMedia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emmis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Emmis quarterly revenues of --. iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M is higher than Emmis's net income of --. Notably, iHeartMedia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Emmis's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia is 0.08x versus 0.73x for Emmis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saga Communications has a net margin of -4.09% compared to iHeartMedia's net margin of 4.51%. iHeartMedia's return on equity of -- beat Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76%.

iHeartMedia has a consensus price target of $3.58, signalling upside risk potential of 68.23%. On the other hand Saga Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.85%. Given that Saga Communications has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, analysts believe Saga Communications is more attractive than iHeartMedia.

iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, which suggesting that the stock is 71.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.005%.

iHeartMedia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Saga Communications offers a yield of 13.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. iHeartMedia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saga Communications pays out 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Saga Communications quarterly revenues of $28.1M. iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M is lower than Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M. Notably, iHeartMedia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saga Communications's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia is 0.08x versus 0.65x for Saga Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban One has a net margin of -4.09% compared to iHeartMedia's net margin of -28.8%. iHeartMedia's return on equity of -- beat Urban One's return on equity of -29.93%.

iHeartMedia has a consensus price target of $3.58, signalling upside risk potential of 68.23%. On the other hand Urban One has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iHeartMedia has higher upside potential than Urban One, analysts believe iHeartMedia is more attractive than Urban One.

iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, which suggesting that the stock is 71.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban One has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.016%.

iHeartMedia has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban One offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. iHeartMedia pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban One pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

iHeartMedia quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Urban One quarterly revenues of $110.4M. iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M is lower than Urban One's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, iHeartMedia's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban One's PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iHeartMedia is 0.08x versus 0.16x for Urban One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.