CMLS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emmis has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Cumulus Media's net margin of --. Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71% beat Emmis's return on equity of --.

Cumulus Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1328.57%. On the other hand Emmis has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than Emmis, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than Emmis.

Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emmis has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.325%.

Cumulus Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emmis offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cumulus Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emmis pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumulus Media quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Emmis quarterly revenues of --. Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Emmis's net income of --. Notably, Cumulus Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Emmis's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumulus Media is 0.02x versus 0.73x for Emmis. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

iHeartMedia has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Cumulus Media's net margin of -4.09%. Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71% beat iHeartMedia's return on equity of --.

Cumulus Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1328.57%. On the other hand iHeartMedia has an analysts' consensus of $3.58 which suggests that it could grow by 68.23%. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than iHeartMedia, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than iHeartMedia.

Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iHeartMedia has a beta of 1.719, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.919%.

Cumulus Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. iHeartMedia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cumulus Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iHeartMedia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumulus Media quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are smaller than iHeartMedia quarterly revenues of $1B. Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M is higher than iHeartMedia's net income of -$41.3M. Notably, Cumulus Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iHeartMedia's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumulus Media is 0.02x versus 0.08x for iHeartMedia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saga Communications has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Cumulus Media's net margin of 4.51%. Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71% beat Saga Communications's return on equity of 2.76%.

Cumulus Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1328.57%. On the other hand Saga Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.85%. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than Saga Communications, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than Saga Communications.

Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saga Communications has a beta of 0.260, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.005%.

Cumulus Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Saga Communications offers a yield of 13.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cumulus Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Saga Communications pays out 209.21% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumulus Media quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Saga Communications quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M is lower than Saga Communications's net income of $1.3M. Notably, Cumulus Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Saga Communications's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumulus Media is 0.02x versus 0.65x for Saga Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban One has a net margin of -5.07% compared to Cumulus Media's net margin of -28.8%. Cumulus Media's return on equity of -52.71% beat Urban One's return on equity of -29.93%.

Cumulus Media has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1328.57%. On the other hand Urban One has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cumulus Media has higher upside potential than Urban One, analysts believe Cumulus Media is more attractive than Urban One.

Cumulus Media has a beta of 1.320, which suggesting that the stock is 31.987% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban One has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.016%.

Cumulus Media has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban One offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cumulus Media pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban One pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cumulus Media quarterly revenues are $203.6M, which are larger than Urban One quarterly revenues of $110.4M. Cumulus Media's net income of -$10.3M is higher than Urban One's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, Cumulus Media's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban One's PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cumulus Media is 0.02x versus 0.16x for Urban One. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.