RRBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 29.5%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.36%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $35.50 which suggests that it could grow by 27.79%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $11M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 9.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.07x versus 2.84x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 20.42%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.36%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.34%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 16.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.07x versus 2.79x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 28.72%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.36%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.41%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Park National.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Park National offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.07x versus 4.48x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 25.81%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 33.36%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.75%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Red River Bancshares, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Red River Bancshares.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.818% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.81%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.73x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.07x versus 2.70x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.