NOVT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CPS Technologies has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Novanta's net margin of -16.77%. Novanta's return on equity of 9.04% beat CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of $161.11, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand CPS Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

Novanta has a beta of 1.423, which suggesting that the stock is 42.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.661%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPS Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPS Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $238.1M, which are larger than CPS Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Novanta's net income of $16.5M is higher than CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.06x while CPS Technologies's PE ratio is 35.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 4.34x versus 1.00x for CPS Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Isomet has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Novanta's net margin of --. Novanta's return on equity of 9.04% beat Isomet's return on equity of --.

Novanta has a consensus price target of $161.11, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand Isomet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Isomet, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Isomet.

Novanta has a beta of 1.423, which suggesting that the stock is 42.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Isomet has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.275%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Isomet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Isomet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $238.1M, which are larger than Isomet quarterly revenues of --. Novanta's net income of $16.5M is higher than Isomet's net income of --. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.06x while Isomet's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 4.34x versus -- for Isomet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Novanta's net margin of -62.9%. Novanta's return on equity of 9.04% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of $161.11, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 225.52%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Novanta, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Novanta.

Novanta has a beta of 1.423, which suggesting that the stock is 42.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.967%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $238.1M, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Novanta's net income of $16.5M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.06x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 4.34x versus 22.19x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optical Cable has a net margin of 6.92% compared to Novanta's net margin of -7.04%. Novanta's return on equity of 9.04% beat Optical Cable's return on equity of -18.34%.

Novanta has a consensus price target of $161.11, signalling upside risk potential of 41.3%. On the other hand Optical Cable has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Novanta has higher upside potential than Optical Cable, analysts believe Novanta is more attractive than Optical Cable.

Novanta has a beta of 1.423, which suggesting that the stock is 42.302% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optical Cable has a beta of 0.288, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.164%.

Novanta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Optical Cable offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Novanta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Optical Cable pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Novanta quarterly revenues are $238.1M, which are larger than Optical Cable quarterly revenues of $15.7M. Novanta's net income of $16.5M is higher than Optical Cable's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Novanta's price-to-earnings ratio is 64.06x while Optical Cable's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Novanta is 4.34x versus 0.33x for Optical Cable. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.