APH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 36.89%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $78.85, signalling upside risk potential of 21.73%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $241.12 which suggests that it could grow by 38.09%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.474%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.82x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 83.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.38x versus 15.31x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KULR Technology Group has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of -62.9%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat KULR Technology Group's return on equity of -852.31%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $78.85, signalling upside risk potential of 21.73%. On the other hand KULR Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 225.52%. Given that KULR Technology Group has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe KULR Technology Group is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KULR Technology Group has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.967%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. KULR Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. KULR Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than KULR Technology Group quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than KULR Technology Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.82x while KULR Technology Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.38x versus 22.19x for KULR Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 11.02%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $78.85, signalling upside risk potential of 21.73%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $107.01 which suggests that it could grow by 106.07%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Amphenol's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.82x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.38x versus 7.79x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.28% compared to Amphenol's net margin of 56.17%. Amphenol's return on equity of 26.57% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Amphenol has a consensus price target of $78.85, signalling upside risk potential of 21.73%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $167.33 which suggests that it could grow by 60.14%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Amphenol, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Amphenol.

Amphenol has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.159% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.959, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.871%.

Amphenol has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.93%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Amphenol pays 24.55% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amphenol quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Amphenol's net income of $746.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Amphenol's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.82x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 35.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amphenol is 5.38x versus 19.86x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.