CPSH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BK Technologies has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of 20.4%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat BK Technologies's return on equity of 34.24%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BK Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $51.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.92%. Given that BK Technologies has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe BK Technologies is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BK Technologies has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.302%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BK Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BK Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are smaller than BK Technologies quarterly revenues of $17.9M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than BK Technologies's net income of $3.7M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while BK Technologies's PE ratio is 19.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.05x versus 2.11x for BK Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -15.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -26.11%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CPS Technologies has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe CPS Technologies is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.4M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.05x versus 0.31x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Emerson Radio has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -13.17%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat Emerson Radio's return on equity of -12.82%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Emerson Radio has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1149.06%. Given that Emerson Radio has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe Emerson Radio is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Radio has a beta of 0.332, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.785%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Emerson Radio offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Radio pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than Emerson Radio quarterly revenues of $4M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is lower than Emerson Radio's net income of -$527K. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while Emerson Radio's PE ratio is 22.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.05x versus 0.76x for Emerson Radio. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -16.77% compared to CPS Technologies's net margin of -105.32%. CPS Technologies's return on equity of -19.34% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

CPS Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1589.19%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than CPS Technologies, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than CPS Technologies.

CPS Technologies has a beta of 1.137, which suggesting that the stock is 13.661% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 4.920, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 392.029%.

CPS Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CPS Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CPS Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.9M, which are larger than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. CPS Technologies's net income of -$995.2K is higher than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, CPS Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 35.93x while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CPS Technologies is 1.05x versus 0.11x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.