HSON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ManpowerGroup has a net margin of -2.3% compared to Hudson Global's net margin of 0.5%. Hudson Global's return on equity of -7.67% beat ManpowerGroup's return on equity of 1.71%.

Hudson Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.3%. On the other hand ManpowerGroup has an analysts' consensus of $71.10 which suggests that it could grow by 24.32%. Given that Hudson Global has higher upside potential than ManpowerGroup, analysts believe Hudson Global is more attractive than ManpowerGroup.

Hudson Global has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.13% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ManpowerGroup has a beta of 1.452, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.183%.

Hudson Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ManpowerGroup offers a yield of 5.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Hudson Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ManpowerGroup pays out 162.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Global quarterly revenues are $36.9M, which are smaller than ManpowerGroup quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Hudson Global's net income of -$846K is lower than ManpowerGroup's net income of $22.8M. Notably, Hudson Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ManpowerGroup's PE ratio is 72.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Global is 0.29x versus 0.15x for ManpowerGroup. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Insperity has a net margin of -2.3% compared to Hudson Global's net margin of 0.19%. Hudson Global's return on equity of -7.67% beat Insperity's return on equity of 102.26%.

Hudson Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.3%. On the other hand Insperity has an analysts' consensus of $90.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.81%. Given that Hudson Global has higher upside potential than Insperity, analysts believe Hudson Global is more attractive than Insperity.

Hudson Global has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.13% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insperity has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.219%.

Hudson Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Insperity offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Hudson Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Insperity pays out 49.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Insperity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hudson Global quarterly revenues are $36.9M, which are smaller than Insperity quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Hudson Global's net income of -$846K is lower than Insperity's net income of $3M. Notably, Hudson Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Insperity's PE ratio is 24.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Global is 0.29x versus 0.45x for Insperity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TrueBlue has a net margin of -2.3% compared to Hudson Global's net margin of -2%. Hudson Global's return on equity of -7.67% beat TrueBlue's return on equity of -28.78%.

Hudson Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.3%. On the other hand TrueBlue has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.24%. Given that Hudson Global has higher upside potential than TrueBlue, analysts believe Hudson Global is more attractive than TrueBlue.

Hudson Global has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.13% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TrueBlue has a beta of 1.475, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.519%.

Hudson Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TrueBlue offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hudson Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TrueBlue pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Global quarterly revenues are $36.9M, which are smaller than TrueBlue quarterly revenues of $382.4M. Hudson Global's net income of -$846K is higher than TrueBlue's net income of -$7.6M. Notably, Hudson Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TrueBlue's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Global is 0.29x versus 0.14x for TrueBlue. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trinet Group has a net margin of -2.3% compared to Hudson Global's net margin of 3.64%. Hudson Global's return on equity of -7.67% beat Trinet Group's return on equity of 285.87%.

Hudson Global has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 64.3%. On the other hand Trinet Group has an analysts' consensus of $123.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.93%. Given that Hudson Global has higher upside potential than Trinet Group, analysts believe Hudson Global is more attractive than Trinet Group.

Hudson Global has a beta of 0.559, which suggesting that the stock is 44.13% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trinet Group has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.638%.

Hudson Global has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trinet Group offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Hudson Global pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trinet Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hudson Global quarterly revenues are $36.9M, which are smaller than Trinet Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hudson Global's net income of -$846K is lower than Trinet Group's net income of $45M. Notably, Hudson Global's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trinet Group's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hudson Global is 0.29x versus 0.92x for Trinet Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.