GLAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 99.99%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -6.7%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.80 which suggests that it could grow by 1.47%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.762%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.17%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $26.9M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $35.7M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 5.03x versus 7.45x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 90.38%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -6.7%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 10.96%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.17%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $26.9M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 5.03x versus 9.21x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of -121.48%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -6.7%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 2.69%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.17%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $26.9M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 5.03x versus 25.85x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 95.4%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5% beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.11%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling downside risk potential of -6.7%. On the other hand PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.17%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, which suggesting that the stock is 25.396% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.675, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.507%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.17%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital offers a yield of 10.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $26.9M, which are smaller than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues of $29.7M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M is lower than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $28.3M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.84x while PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's PE ratio is 8.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 5.03x versus 7.07x for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.