GAIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 93.71%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.97%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $16.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.07%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.835%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $118.8M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $111.3M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.14x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 11.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 7.47x versus 11.15x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 96.47%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could fall by -7.27%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.396%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.14x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 7.47x versus 5.06x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of 90.38%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 10.7%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.494, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.391%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.14x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 7.47x versus 9.23x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 99.99% compared to Gladstone Investment's net margin of -121.48%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 14.72% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $13.80, signalling upside risk potential of 1.25%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 1.19%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.288, which suggesting that the stock is 28.762% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.562%.

Gladstone Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 13.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Gladstone Investment pays 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues are $35.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Gladstone Investment's net income of $38.5M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Gladstone Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.14x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 23.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Investment is 7.47x versus 26.23x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.