PFLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 95.4% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 96.47%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.11% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 22.5%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 4.76%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.514%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.24%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 8.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $26.9M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $28.3M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $27.1M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.18x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.30x versus 4.48x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 95.4% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 90.38%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.11% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.47%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.47 which suggests that it could grow by 25.76%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than PennantPark Floating Rate Capital.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.938%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.24%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $26.6M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $28.3M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $24.1M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.18x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.30x versus 8.13x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 95.4% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of -121.48%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.11% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.66%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $15.92 which suggests that it could grow by 14.59%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.845, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.466%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.24%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $3.1M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $28.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $7.2M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.18x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 20.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.30x versus 23.16x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pennant Park Investment has a net margin of 95.4% compared to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net margin of 86.61%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 12.11% beat Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 10.94%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $11.75, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Pennant Park Investment has an analysts' consensus of $7.00 which suggests that it could grow by 8.7%. Given that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.289%.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 12.24%. Pennant Park Investment offers a yield of 14.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays 85.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Pennant Park Investment pays out 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pennant Park Investment's is not.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues of $18.6M. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's net income of $28.3M is higher than Pennant Park Investment's net income of $16.1M. Notably, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.18x while Pennant Park Investment's PE ratio is 24.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is 6.30x versus 6.49x for Pennant Park Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.