BYNO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crescent Capital BDC has a net margin of -- compared to byNordic Acquisition's net margin of 84.43%. byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68%.

byNordic Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Crescent Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $19.67 which suggests that it could grow by 6.19%. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than byNordic Acquisition, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than byNordic Acquisition.

byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

byNordic Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Crescent Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. byNordic Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC pays out 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $18.1M. byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K is lower than Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M. Notably, byNordic Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 466.13x while Crescent Capital BDC's PE ratio is 7.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for byNordic Acquisition is -- versus 6.59x for Crescent Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

dMY Squared Technology Group has a net margin of -- compared to byNordic Acquisition's net margin of --. byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat dMY Squared Technology Group's return on equity of --.

byNordic Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand dMY Squared Technology Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that byNordic Acquisition has higher upside potential than dMY Squared Technology Group, analysts believe byNordic Acquisition is more attractive than dMY Squared Technology Group.

byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison dMY Squared Technology Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

byNordic Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. dMY Squared Technology Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. byNordic Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. dMY Squared Technology Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than dMY Squared Technology Group quarterly revenues of --. byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K is lower than dMY Squared Technology Group's net income of $145.5K. Notably, byNordic Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 466.13x while dMY Squared Technology Group's PE ratio is 59.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for byNordic Acquisition is -- versus -- for dMY Squared Technology Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graf Global has a net margin of -- compared to byNordic Acquisition's net margin of --. byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

byNordic Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that byNordic Acquisition has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe byNordic Acquisition is more attractive than Graf Global.

byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

byNordic Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. byNordic Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K is lower than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, byNordic Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 466.13x while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for byNordic Acquisition is -- versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of -- compared to byNordic Acquisition's net margin of -140.03%. byNordic Acquisition's return on equity of -- beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

byNordic Acquisition has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than byNordic Acquisition, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than byNordic Acquisition.

byNordic Acquisition has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

byNordic Acquisition has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. byNordic Acquisition pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

byNordic Acquisition quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. byNordic Acquisition's net income of -$206.2K is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, byNordic Acquisition's price-to-earnings ratio is 466.13x while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for byNordic Acquisition is -- versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.