CCAP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graf Global has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Graf Global's return on equity of --.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.19%. On the other hand Graf Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Graf Global, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Graf Global.

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graf Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.48%. Graf Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Graf Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Graf Global quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Graf Global's net income of $2.8M. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Graf Global's PE ratio is 98.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.59x versus -- for Graf Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perception Capital Corp III has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Perception Capital Corp III's return on equity of --.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.19%. On the other hand Perception Capital Corp III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Perception Capital Corp III, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Perception Capital Corp III.

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perception Capital Corp III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.48%. Perception Capital Corp III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Perception Capital Corp III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Perception Capital Corp III quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Perception Capital Corp III's net income of -$231.5K. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Perception Capital Corp III's PE ratio is 153.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.59x versus -- for Perception Capital Corp III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plum Acquisition Corp III has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of --. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Plum Acquisition Corp III's return on equity of --.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.19%. On the other hand Plum Acquisition Corp III has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crescent Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Plum Acquisition Corp III, analysts believe Crescent Capital BDC is more attractive than Plum Acquisition Corp III.

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plum Acquisition Corp III has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.48%. Plum Acquisition Corp III offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Plum Acquisition Corp III pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Plum Acquisition Corp III quarterly revenues of --. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Plum Acquisition Corp III's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Plum Acquisition Corp III's PE ratio is 558.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.59x versus -- for Plum Acquisition Corp III. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unusual Machines has a net margin of 84.43% compared to Crescent Capital BDC's net margin of -140.03%. Crescent Capital BDC's return on equity of 12.68% beat Unusual Machines's return on equity of --.

Crescent Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $19.67, signalling upside risk potential of 6.19%. On the other hand Unusual Machines has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Unusual Machines has higher upside potential than Crescent Capital BDC, analysts believe Unusual Machines is more attractive than Crescent Capital BDC.

Crescent Capital BDC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unusual Machines has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Crescent Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.48%. Unusual Machines offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crescent Capital BDC pays 77% of its earnings as a dividend. Unusual Machines pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crescent Capital BDC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crescent Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $18.1M, which are larger than Unusual Machines quarterly revenues of $1.5M. Crescent Capital BDC's net income of $15.3M is higher than Unusual Machines's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Crescent Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.23x while Unusual Machines's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crescent Capital BDC is 6.59x versus -- for Unusual Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.