ASML Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 16.54%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $940.48, signalling upside risk potential of 36.18%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $206.3200 which suggests that it could grow by 39.71%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.488%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.21x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.90x versus 4.43x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 6.29%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $940.48, signalling upside risk potential of 36.18%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $146.53 which suggests that it could grow by 37.4%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than ASML Holding NV, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than ASML Holding NV.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. ASML Holding NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.21x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 107.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.90x versus 6.77x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lam Research has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 27.22%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $940.48, signalling upside risk potential of 36.18%. On the other hand Lam Research has an analysts' consensus of $95.41 which suggests that it could grow by 27.54%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Lam Research.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lam Research has a beta of 1.532, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.235%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Lam Research offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research pays out 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Lam Research quarterly revenues of $4.4B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is higher than Lam Research's net income of $1.2B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.21x while Lam Research's PE ratio is 22.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.90x versus 6.03x for Lam Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 29.08% compared to ASML Holding NV's net margin of 34.62%. ASML Holding NV's return on equity of 49.41% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

ASML Holding NV has a consensus price target of $940.48, signalling upside risk potential of 36.18%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 29.61%. Given that ASML Holding NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe ASML Holding NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

ASML Holding NV has a beta of 1.544, which suggesting that the stock is 54.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

ASML Holding NV has a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.98%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. ASML Holding NV pays 32.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ASML Holding NV quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. ASML Holding NV's net income of $2.9B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, ASML Holding NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.21x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ASML Holding NV is 8.90x versus 11.15x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.