AMAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.14%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 17.24%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.76x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.29x versus 2.82x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetroCity Bankshares has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 45.26%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat MetroCity Bankshares's return on equity of 15.08%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.14%. On the other hand MetroCity Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.68%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than MetroCity Bankshares, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than MetroCity Bankshares.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetroCity Bankshares has a beta of 0.636, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.398%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. MetroCity Bankshares offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. MetroCity Bankshares pays out 35.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than MetroCity Bankshares quarterly revenues of $36.9M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than MetroCity Bankshares's net income of $16.7M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.76x while MetroCity Bankshares's PE ratio is 13.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.29x versus 6.05x for MetroCity Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.14%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.58%. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Park National offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.76x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.29x versus 5.60x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penns Woods Bancorp has a net margin of 34.13% compared to Amalgamated Financial's net margin of 27.47%. Amalgamated Financial's return on equity of 16.92% beat Penns Woods Bancorp's return on equity of 10.18%.

Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $43.50, signalling upside risk potential of 31.14%. On the other hand Penns Woods Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Amalgamated Financial has higher upside potential than Penns Woods Bancorp, analysts believe Amalgamated Financial is more attractive than Penns Woods Bancorp.

Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.307% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penns Woods Bancorp has a beta of 0.478, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.178%.

Amalgamated Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.39%. Penns Woods Bancorp offers a yield of 4.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Amalgamated Financial pays 14.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Penns Woods Bancorp pays out 55.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Amalgamated Financial quarterly revenues are $81.9M, which are larger than Penns Woods Bancorp quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Amalgamated Financial's net income of $27.9M is higher than Penns Woods Bancorp's net income of $4.8M. Notably, Amalgamated Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.76x while Penns Woods Bancorp's PE ratio is 11.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Amalgamated Financial is 3.29x versus 3.41x for Penns Woods Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.