ADTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ClearOne has a net margin of -18.91% compared to Adtran Holdings's net margin of -82.35%. Adtran Holdings's return on equity of -62.59% beat ClearOne's return on equity of -12.61%.

Adtran Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 77.18%. On the other hand ClearOne has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1860.78%. Given that ClearOne has higher upside potential than Adtran Holdings, analysts believe ClearOne is more attractive than Adtran Holdings.

Adtran Holdings has a beta of 1.456, which suggesting that the stock is 45.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ClearOne has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.308%.

Adtran Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ClearOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Adtran Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ClearOne pays out -161.37% of its earnings as a dividend.

Adtran Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are larger than ClearOne quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Adtran Holdings's net income of -$45.9M is lower than ClearOne's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Adtran Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ClearOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtran Holdings is 0.64x versus 1.07x for ClearOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cisco Systems has a net margin of -18.91% compared to Adtran Holdings's net margin of 17.35%. Adtran Holdings's return on equity of -62.59% beat Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12%.

Adtran Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 77.18%. On the other hand Cisco Systems has an analysts' consensus of $69.15 which suggests that it could grow by 24.01%. Given that Adtran Holdings has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Adtran Holdings is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Adtran Holdings has a beta of 1.456, which suggesting that the stock is 45.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.432%.

Adtran Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cisco Systems offers a yield of 2.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Adtran Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems pays out 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Adtran Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are smaller than Cisco Systems quarterly revenues of $14B. Adtran Holdings's net income of -$45.9M is lower than Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Adtran Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cisco Systems's PE ratio is 24.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtran Holdings is 0.64x versus 4.15x for Cisco Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lantronix has a net margin of -18.91% compared to Adtran Holdings's net margin of -7.61%. Adtran Holdings's return on equity of -62.59% beat Lantronix's return on equity of -6.25%.

Adtran Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 77.18%. On the other hand Lantronix has an analysts' consensus of $5.60 which suggests that it could grow by 173.17%. Given that Lantronix has higher upside potential than Adtran Holdings, analysts believe Lantronix is more attractive than Adtran Holdings.

Adtran Holdings has a beta of 1.456, which suggesting that the stock is 45.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lantronix has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.711%.

Adtran Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lantronix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adtran Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lantronix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adtran Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are larger than Lantronix quarterly revenues of $31.2M. Adtran Holdings's net income of -$45.9M is lower than Lantronix's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Adtran Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lantronix's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtran Holdings is 0.64x versus 0.50x for Lantronix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Moving iMage Technologies has a net margin of -18.91% compared to Adtran Holdings's net margin of -15.32%. Adtran Holdings's return on equity of -62.59% beat Moving iMage Technologies's return on equity of -26.11%.

Adtran Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.20, signalling upside risk potential of 77.18%. On the other hand Moving iMage Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Adtran Holdings has higher upside potential than Moving iMage Technologies, analysts believe Adtran Holdings is more attractive than Moving iMage Technologies.

Adtran Holdings has a beta of 1.456, which suggesting that the stock is 45.601% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Moving iMage Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Adtran Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Moving iMage Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Adtran Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Moving iMage Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Adtran Holdings quarterly revenues are $242.9M, which are larger than Moving iMage Technologies quarterly revenues of $3.4M. Adtran Holdings's net income of -$45.9M is lower than Moving iMage Technologies's net income of -$527K. Notably, Adtran Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Moving iMage Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Adtran Holdings is 0.64x versus 0.31x for Moving iMage Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.