CSCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Applied Materials has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Cisco Systems's net margin of 16.54%. Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

Cisco Systems has a consensus price target of $70.37, signalling upside risk potential of 15.62%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $206.3200 which suggests that it could grow by 42.23%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.488%.

Cisco Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Cisco Systems pays 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cisco Systems quarterly revenues are $14B, which are larger than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B is higher than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Cisco Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 18.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cisco Systems is 4.53x versus 4.36x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadcom has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Cisco Systems's net margin of 36.89%. Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

Cisco Systems has a consensus price target of $70.37, signalling upside risk potential of 15.62%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 48.07%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

Cisco Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Cisco Systems pays 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

Cisco Systems quarterly revenues are $14B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, Cisco Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 81.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cisco Systems is 4.53x versus 14.83x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Cisco Systems's net margin of 7.98%. Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat Hewlett Packard Enterprise's return on equity of 12.2%.

Cisco Systems has a consensus price target of $70.37, signalling upside risk potential of 15.62%. On the other hand Hewlett Packard Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of $20.14 which suggests that it could grow by 27.57%. Given that Hewlett Packard Enterprise has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe Hewlett Packard Enterprise is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hewlett Packard Enterprise has a beta of 1.207, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.739%.

Cisco Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. Hewlett Packard Enterprise offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Cisco Systems pays 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Hewlett Packard Enterprise pays out 26.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cisco Systems quarterly revenues are $14B, which are larger than Hewlett Packard Enterprise quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B is higher than Hewlett Packard Enterprise's net income of $627M. Notably, Cisco Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while Hewlett Packard Enterprise's PE ratio is 7.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cisco Systems is 4.53x versus 0.69x for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 17.35% compared to Cisco Systems's net margin of 56.17%. Cisco Systems's return on equity of 20.12% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Cisco Systems has a consensus price target of $70.37, signalling upside risk potential of 15.62%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 55.93%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Cisco Systems.

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.789, which suggesting that the stock is 21.103% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Cisco Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.63%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Cisco Systems pays 61.86% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cisco Systems quarterly revenues are $14B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Cisco Systems's net income of $2.4B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Cisco Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.58x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cisco Systems is 4.53x versus 20.85x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.