WHR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lowe's Companies has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 6.06%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Lowe's Companies's return on equity of --.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $101.93, signalling upside risk potential of 31.69%. On the other hand Lowe's Companies has an analysts' consensus of $276.07 which suggests that it could grow by 24.97%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Lowe's Companies, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Lowe's Companies.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lowe's Companies has a beta of 1.067, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.662%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.04%. Lowe's Companies offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies pays out 36.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Lowe's Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Lowe's Companies quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Lowe's Companies's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 552.86x while Lowe's Companies's PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.27x versus 1.50x for Lowe's Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Las Vegas Sands has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 12.3%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Las Vegas Sands's return on equity of 36.71%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $101.93, signalling upside risk potential of 31.69%. On the other hand Las Vegas Sands has an analysts' consensus of $51.78 which suggests that it could grow by 44.27%. Given that Las Vegas Sands has higher upside potential than Whirlpool, analysts believe Las Vegas Sands is more attractive than Whirlpool.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 0.993, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.668%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.04%. Las Vegas Sands offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands pays out 40.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Las Vegas Sands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Las Vegas Sands quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Las Vegas Sands's net income of $352M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 552.86x while Las Vegas Sands's PE ratio is 19.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.27x versus 2.33x for Las Vegas Sands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 3.53%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $101.93, signalling upside risk potential of 31.69%. On the other hand Mohawk Industries has an analysts' consensus of $137.20 which suggests that it could grow by 28.38%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Mohawk Industries, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Mohawk Industries.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.230, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.971%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.04%. Mohawk Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Mohawk Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 552.86x while Mohawk Industries's PE ratio is 13.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.27x versus 0.63x for Mohawk Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 1.96% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 2.12%. Whirlpool's return on equity of 0.23% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $101.93, signalling upside risk potential of 31.69%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.42 which suggests that it could grow by 1.57%. Given that Whirlpool has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Whirlpool is more attractive than Tesla.

Whirlpool has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.576, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 157.555%.

Whirlpool has a quarterly dividend of $1.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 9.04%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Whirlpool pays -118.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Whirlpool quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Whirlpool's net income of $71M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Whirlpool's price-to-earnings ratio is 552.86x while Tesla's PE ratio is 156.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Whirlpool is 0.27x versus 10.44x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.