MHK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Mohawk Industries's net margin of --. Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $138.20, signalling upside risk potential of 36.94%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mohawk Industries has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Mohawk Industries is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 22.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mohawk Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mohawk Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Mohawk Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.41x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mohawk Industries is 0.59x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Mohawk Industries's net margin of 1.54%. Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $138.20, signalling upside risk potential of 36.94%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Mohawk Industries has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Mohawk Industries is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 22.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.489, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.854%.

Mohawk Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mohawk Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M is higher than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Mohawk Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.41x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 40.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mohawk Industries is 0.59x versus 0.15x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Lovesac has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Mohawk Industries's net margin of 14.62%. Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75% beat The Lovesac's return on equity of 5.57%.

Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $138.20, signalling upside risk potential of 36.94%. On the other hand The Lovesac has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 61.65%. Given that The Lovesac has higher upside potential than Mohawk Industries, analysts believe The Lovesac is more attractive than Mohawk Industries.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 22.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Lovesac has a beta of 3.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 207.891%.

Mohawk Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Lovesac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mohawk Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Lovesac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than The Lovesac quarterly revenues of $241.5M. Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M is higher than The Lovesac's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Mohawk Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.41x while The Lovesac's PE ratio is 32.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mohawk Industries is 0.59x versus 0.48x for The Lovesac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 3.53% compared to Mohawk Industries's net margin of -46.97%. Mohawk Industries's return on equity of 6.75% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $138.20, signalling upside risk potential of 36.94%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 560.38%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Mohawk Industries, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Mohawk Industries.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.230, which suggesting that the stock is 22.971% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.56%.

Mohawk Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mohawk Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mohawk Industries quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Mohawk Industries's net income of $93.2M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Mohawk Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.41x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mohawk Industries is 0.59x versus 1.26x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.