PH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dover has a net margin of 20% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 74.41%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 25.88% beat Dover's return on equity of 47.69%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $721.02, signalling upside risk potential of 37.21%. On the other hand Dover has an analysts' consensus of $208.65 which suggests that it could grow by 38.05%. Given that Dover has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Dover is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dover has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.106%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Dover offers a yield of 1.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Dover pays out 10.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Dover quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $948.5M is lower than Dover's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.75x while Dover's PE ratio is 7.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 3.45x versus 2.56x for Dover. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plug Power has a net margin of 20% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of -697.46%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 25.88% beat Plug Power's return on equity of -77.08%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $721.02, signalling upside risk potential of 37.21%. On the other hand Plug Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.22 which suggests that it could grow by 98.46%. Given that Plug Power has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Plug Power is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plug Power has a beta of 2.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.009%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Plug Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Plug Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Plug Power quarterly revenues of $191.5M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $948.5M is higher than Plug Power's net income of -$1.3B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.75x while Plug Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 3.45x versus 1.40x for Plug Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of 20% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of -39.54%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 25.88% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -41.51%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $721.02, signalling upside risk potential of 37.21%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $24.76 which suggests that it could grow by 44.12%. Given that Rocket Lab USA has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Rocket Lab USA is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $132.4M. Parker Hannifin's net income of $948.5M is higher than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$52.3M. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.75x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 3.45x versus 19.53x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 20% compared to Parker Hannifin's net margin of 6.85%. Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 25.88% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Parker Hannifin has a consensus price target of $721.02, signalling upside risk potential of 37.21%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $141.79 which suggests that it could grow by 17.71%. Given that Parker Hannifin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Parker Hannifin is more attractive than RTX.

Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.388, which suggesting that the stock is 38.758% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Parker Hannifin has a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.24%. RTX offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Parker Hannifin pays 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues are $4.7B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Parker Hannifin's net income of $948.5M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Parker Hannifin's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.75x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Parker Hannifin is 3.45x versus 2.00x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.