MPC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HF Sinclair has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of -1.05%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31% beat HF Sinclair's return on equity of 3.23%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $169.53, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand HF Sinclair has an analysts' consensus of $49.23 which suggests that it could grow by 45.83%. Given that HF Sinclair has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe HF Sinclair is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HF Sinclair has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.691%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. HF Sinclair offers a yield of 5.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. HF Sinclair pays out 21.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than HF Sinclair quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M is higher than HF Sinclair's net income of -$75.9M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while HF Sinclair's PE ratio is 20.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.33x versus 0.22x for HF Sinclair. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Delek US Holdings has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of -2.52%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31% beat Delek US Holdings's return on equity of -31.09%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $169.53, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Delek US Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.14 which suggests that it could grow by 26.37%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Delek US Holdings, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Delek US Holdings.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek US Holdings has a beta of 1.219, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.897%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Delek US Holdings offers a yield of 6.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek US Holdings pays out 304.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Marathon Petroleum's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Delek US Holdings's is not.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Delek US Holdings quarterly revenues of $3B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M is higher than Delek US Holdings's net income of -$76.8M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Delek US Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.33x versus 0.07x for Delek US Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Phillips 66 has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 0.97%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31% beat Phillips 66's return on equity of 10.89%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $169.53, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Phillips 66 has an analysts' consensus of $141.58 which suggests that it could grow by 28.28%. Given that Phillips 66 has higher upside potential than Marathon Petroleum, analysts believe Phillips 66 is more attractive than Marathon Petroleum.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.962%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Phillips 66 offers a yield of 4.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 26.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are smaller than Phillips 66 quarterly revenues of $35.5B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M is higher than Phillips 66's net income of $346M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Phillips 66's PE ratio is 14.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.33x versus 0.32x for Phillips 66. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valero Energy has a net margin of 1.77% compared to Marathon Petroleum's net margin of 1.11%. Marathon Petroleum's return on equity of 15.31% beat Valero Energy's return on equity of 13.03%.

Marathon Petroleum has a consensus price target of $169.53, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Valero Energy has an analysts' consensus of $149.39 which suggests that it could grow by 25.97%. Given that Marathon Petroleum has higher upside potential than Valero Energy, analysts believe Marathon Petroleum is more attractive than Valero Energy.

Marathon Petroleum has a beta of 1.396, which suggesting that the stock is 39.569% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valero Energy has a beta of 1.397, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.739%.

Marathon Petroleum has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Valero Energy offers a yield of 3.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Marathon Petroleum pays 13.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Valero Energy pays out 16.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marathon Petroleum quarterly revenues are $35.1B, which are larger than Valero Energy quarterly revenues of $32.9B. Marathon Petroleum's net income of $622M is higher than Valero Energy's net income of $364M. Notably, Marathon Petroleum's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.57x while Valero Energy's PE ratio is 10.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marathon Petroleum is 0.33x versus 0.29x for Valero Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.