Financhill
Sell
36

COP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$94.85
Seasonality move :
2.65%
Day range:
$94.23 - $96.38
52-week range:
$94.23 - $135.18
Dividend yield:
3.28%
P/E ratio:
11.31x
P/S ratio:
2.02x
P/B ratio:
2.19x
Volume:
26.8M
Avg. volume:
7.8M
1-year change:
-18.48%
Market cap:
$109.5B
Revenue:
$56.1B
EPS (TTM):
$8.41

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
COP
ConocoPhillips
$13.6B $1.64 -8.16% -28.72% $132.86
CVX
Chevron
$49B $2.42 -3.44% 102.82% $175.06
EOG
EOG Resources
$6B $2.77 -0.77% -22.59% $145.21
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$2.4B $3.92 58.78% -34.36% $215.17
MTDR
Matador Resources
$830.3M $1.65 20.31% -11.43% $76.36
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$88.4B $1.87 10.63% -6.53% $130.14
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
COP
ConocoPhillips
$95.12 $132.86 $109.5B 11.31x $0.78 3.28% 2.02x
CVX
Chevron
$142.85 $175.06 $254.7B 15.70x $1.63 4.56% 1.35x
EOG
EOG Resources
$119.04 $145.21 $67B 9.58x $0.91 3.06% 2.88x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$154.94 $215.17 $45.2B 8.87x $0.90 5.35% 2.99x
MTDR
Matador Resources
$53.07 $76.36 $6.6B 7.03x $0.25 1.6% 1.95x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$105.87 $130.14 $465.3B 13.18x $0.99 3.63% 1.31x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
COP
ConocoPhillips
26.85% -0.022 15.11% 1.08x
CVX
Chevron
14.2% 0.406 9.81% 0.68x
EOG
EOG Resources
11.32% 0.054 6.18% 1.97x
FANG
Diamondback Energy
25.67% 0.572 24.92% 0.40x
MTDR
Matador Resources
42.47% 1.413 56.24% 0.65x
XOM
Exxon Mobil
13.68% -0.024 8.14% 0.98x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
COP
ConocoPhillips
$3.6B $2.9B 14.72% 20.22% 26.87% $2.8B
CVX
Chevron
$14.3B $5B 9.08% 10.33% 13.6% $5.6B
EOG
EOG Resources
$4B $2B 22.04% 24.93% 36.91% $2.1B
FANG
Diamondback Energy
$1.1B $968M 10.46% 14.68% 35.39% -$7.3B
MTDR
Matador Resources
$382.9M $352.4M 13.4% 20.48% 45.83% $185.8M
XOM
Exxon Mobil
$20.4B $11B 12.11% 14.21% 15.07% $11.4B

ConocoPhillips vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns COP or CVX?

    Chevron has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 9.17%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Chevron's return on equity of 10.33%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    27.94% $1.76 $68.2B
    CVX
    Chevron
    29.15% $2.48 $182.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or CVX?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.68%. On the other hand Chevron has an analysts' consensus of $175.06 which suggests that it could grow by 23.01%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Chevron, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Chevron.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 5 0
    CVX
    Chevron
    7 8 0
  • Is COP or CVX More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chevron has a beta of 1.105, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.462%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or CVX?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Chevron offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Chevron pays out 53.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or CVX?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are smaller than Chevron quarterly revenues of $48.9B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is lower than Chevron's net income of $4.5B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Chevron's PE ratio is 15.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.02x versus 1.35x for Chevron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    2.02x 11.31x $13B $2.1B
    CVX
    Chevron
    1.35x 15.70x $48.9B $4.5B
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or EOG?

    EOG Resources has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 28.53%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat EOG Resources's return on equity of 24.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    27.94% $1.76 $68.2B
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    68.15% $2.95 $33.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or EOG?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.68%. On the other hand EOG Resources has an analysts' consensus of $145.21 which suggests that it could grow by 21.98%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than EOG Resources, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than EOG Resources.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 5 0
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    13 17 0
  • Is COP or EOG More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EOG Resources has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.345%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or EOG?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. EOG Resources offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. EOG Resources pays out 44.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or EOG?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than EOG Resources quarterly revenues of $5.9B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than EOG Resources's net income of $1.7B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while EOG Resources's PE ratio is 9.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.02x versus 2.88x for EOG Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    2.02x 11.31x $13B $2.1B
    EOG
    EOG Resources
    2.88x 9.58x $5.9B $1.7B
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or FANG?

    Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 24.92%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 14.68%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    27.94% $1.76 $68.2B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    40% $3.19 $51.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.68%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $215.17 which suggests that it could grow by 38.88%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Diamondback Energy, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Diamondback Energy.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 5 0
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    13 5 0
  • Is COP or FANG More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.885, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.497%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 5.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 45.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or FANG?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $2.6B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than Diamondback Energy's net income of $659M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.02x versus 2.99x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    2.02x 11.31x $13B $2.1B
    FANG
    Diamondback Energy
    2.99x 8.87x $2.6B $659M
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or MTDR?

    Matador Resources has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 28.87%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Matador Resources's return on equity of 20.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    27.94% $1.76 $68.2B
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    44.51% $1.99 $8.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or MTDR?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.68%. On the other hand Matador Resources has an analysts' consensus of $76.36 which suggests that it could grow by 40.57%. Given that Matador Resources has higher upside potential than ConocoPhillips, analysts believe Matador Resources is more attractive than ConocoPhillips.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 5 0
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    10 1 0
  • Is COP or MTDR More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Matador Resources has a beta of 3.262, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 226.245%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or MTDR?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Matador Resources offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Matador Resources pays out 9.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or MTDR?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are larger than Matador Resources quarterly revenues of $860.1M. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is higher than Matador Resources's net income of $248.3M. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Matador Resources's PE ratio is 7.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.02x versus 1.95x for Matador Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    2.02x 11.31x $13B $2.1B
    MTDR
    Matador Resources
    1.95x 7.03x $860.1M $248.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns COP or XOM?

    Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 15.79% compared to ConocoPhillips's net margin of 9.81%. ConocoPhillips's return on equity of 20.22% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 14.21%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    27.94% $1.76 $68.2B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    23.23% $1.92 $319B
  • What do Analysts Say About COP or XOM?

    ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $132.86, signalling upside risk potential of 39.68%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $130.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.92%. Given that ConocoPhillips has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe ConocoPhillips is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    13 5 0
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    8 12 0
  • Is COP or XOM More Risky?

    ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.904% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.004%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock COP or XOM?

    ConocoPhillips has a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.28%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. ConocoPhillips pays 50.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios COP or XOM?

    ConocoPhillips quarterly revenues are $13B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $87.8B. ConocoPhillips's net income of $2.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $8.6B. Notably, ConocoPhillips's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.31x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ConocoPhillips is 2.02x versus 1.31x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    COP
    ConocoPhillips
    2.02x 11.31x $13B $2.1B
    XOM
    Exxon Mobil
    1.31x 13.18x $87.8B $8.6B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23

Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.8% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23

Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.65% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 4.96% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock