K Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

WK Kellogg has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of -1.6%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat WK Kellogg's return on equity of 23.21%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $60.05, signalling downside risk potential of -0.12%. On the other hand WK Kellogg has an analysts' consensus of $19.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.21%. Given that WK Kellogg has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe WK Kellogg is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.868% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WK Kellogg has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. WK Kellogg offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. WK Kellogg pays out 615.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WK Kellogg's is not.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than WK Kellogg quarterly revenues of $689M. Kellanova's net income of $367M is higher than WK Kellogg's net income of -$11M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while WK Kellogg's PE ratio is 23.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 0.58x for WK Kellogg. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 9.27%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $60.05, signalling downside risk potential of -0.12%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $78.40 which suggests that it could grow by 31%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.868% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.529, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.056%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Kellanova's net income of $367M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 21.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 2.24x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of --. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $60.05, signalling downside risk potential of -0.12%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kellanova has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Kellanova is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.868% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.010, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.048%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kellanova's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Kellanova's net income of $367M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 11.35% compared to Kellanova's net margin of 3.7%. Kellanova's return on equity of 27.75% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Kellanova has a consensus price target of $60.05, signalling downside risk potential of -0.12%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.69%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Kellanova, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Kellanova.

Kellanova has a beta of 0.381, which suggesting that the stock is 61.868% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.193, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.272%.

Kellanova has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.79%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kellanova pays 84.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kellanova quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Kellanova's net income of $367M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Kellanova's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.87x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kellanova is 2.19x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.