SPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Central Garden & Pet has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 2.13%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.96%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand Central Garden & Pet has an analysts' consensus of $41.75 which suggests that it could grow by 12.96%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Central Garden & Pet, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Central Garden & Pet.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 19.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.366%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Central Garden & Pet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Central Garden & Pet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are larger than Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues of $656.4M. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is higher than Central Garden & Pet's net income of $14M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Central Garden & Pet's PE ratio is 19.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.68x versus 0.73x for Central Garden & Pet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 14.94%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.29%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 19.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 26.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.68x versus 3.77x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of 11.45%. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.11 which suggests that it could grow by 14.78%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Clorox.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 19.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.696%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is lower than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while Clorox's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.68x versus 2.49x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 3.36% compared to Spectrum Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $100.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.79%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.200, which suggesting that the stock is 19.96% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.136, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.446%.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $700.2M, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Spectrum Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.25x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Spectrum Brands Holdings is 0.68x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.