HPQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dell Technologies has a net margin of 6.45% compared to HP's net margin of 4.65%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Dell Technologies's return on equity of --.

HP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.03%. On the other hand Dell Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $154.76 which suggests that it could grow by 30.87%. Given that Dell Technologies has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Dell Technologies is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dell Technologies has a beta of 0.902, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.777%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Dell Technologies offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Dell Technologies pays out 33.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are smaller than Dell Technologies quarterly revenues of $24.4B. HP's net income of $906M is lower than Dell Technologies's net income of $1.1B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Dell Technologies's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.61x versus 0.89x for Dell Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 6.45% compared to HP's net margin of -125.26%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Intel's return on equity of -14.47%.

HP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.03%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 24.63%. Given that Intel has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Intel is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.052, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.181%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Intel offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out 182.83% of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Intel's is not.

HP quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Intel quarterly revenues of $13.3B. HP's net income of $906M is higher than Intel's net income of -$16.6B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Intel's PE ratio is 91.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.61x versus 1.54x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Qualcomm has a net margin of 6.45% compared to HP's net margin of 28.51%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Qualcomm's return on equity of 42.24%.

HP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.03%. On the other hand Qualcomm has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 33.89%. Given that Qualcomm has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Qualcomm is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Qualcomm has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.479%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Qualcomm offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Qualcomm pays out 36.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Qualcomm quarterly revenues of $10.2B. HP's net income of $906M is lower than Qualcomm's net income of $2.9B. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Qualcomm's PE ratio is 17.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.61x versus 4.44x for Qualcomm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Super Micro Computer has a net margin of 6.45% compared to HP's net margin of 6.65%. HP's return on equity of -- beat Super Micro Computer's return on equity of 33.98%.

HP has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.03%. On the other hand Super Micro Computer has an analysts' consensus of $41.93 which suggests that it could grow by 32.73%. Given that Super Micro Computer has higher upside potential than HP, analysts believe Super Micro Computer is more attractive than HP.

HP has a beta of 1.041, which suggesting that the stock is 4.05% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Super Micro Computer has a beta of 1.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.097%.

HP has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.39%. Super Micro Computer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. HP pays 38.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Super Micro Computer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. HP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

HP quarterly revenues are $14.1B, which are larger than Super Micro Computer quarterly revenues of $5.3B. HP's net income of $906M is higher than Super Micro Computer's net income of $352.7M. Notably, HP's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.72x while Super Micro Computer's PE ratio is 15.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for HP is 0.61x versus 1.27x for Super Micro Computer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.