GIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lamb Weston Holdings has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of -2.26%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Lamb Weston Holdings's return on equity of 21.14%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $66.77, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Lamb Weston Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $68.86 which suggests that it could grow by 41.55%. Given that Lamb Weston Holdings has higher upside potential than General Mills, analysts believe Lamb Weston Holdings is more attractive than General Mills.

General Mills has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lamb Weston Holdings has a beta of 0.756, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.375%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Lamb Weston Holdings offers a yield of 2.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Lamb Weston Holdings pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lamb Weston Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.6B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than Lamb Weston Holdings's net income of -$36.1M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Lamb Weston Holdings's PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.70x versus 1.11x for Lamb Weston Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 5.48%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $66.77, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $164.32 which suggests that it could grow by 10.78%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than PepsiCo.

General Mills has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.70x versus 2.23x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of 5.4%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 28.51%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $66.77, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $49.14 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

General Mills has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.678%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Mills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.4B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $235.9M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.70x versus 0.67x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JM Smucker has a net margin of 15.19% compared to General Mills's net margin of -30.3%. General Mills's return on equity of 27.15% beat JM Smucker's return on equity of -3.42%.

General Mills has a consensus price target of $66.77, signalling upside risk potential of 11.56%. On the other hand JM Smucker has an analysts' consensus of $119.34 which suggests that it could grow by 6.78%. Given that General Mills has higher upside potential than JM Smucker, analysts believe General Mills is more attractive than JM Smucker.

General Mills has a beta of 0.064, which suggesting that the stock is 93.636% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JM Smucker has a beta of 0.281, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 71.851%.

General Mills has a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.99%. JM Smucker offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.08 per share. General Mills pays 54.61% of its earnings as a dividend. JM Smucker pays out 58.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Mills quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than JM Smucker quarterly revenues of $2.2B. General Mills's net income of $795.7M is higher than JM Smucker's net income of -$662.3M. Notably, General Mills's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.01x while JM Smucker's PE ratio is 22.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Mills is 1.70x versus 1.69x for JM Smucker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.