PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 15.83%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.55%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.85 which suggests that it could grow by 16.96%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.609, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.118%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.29x versus 2.94x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 24.03%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.55%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.72 which suggests that it could grow by 17.85%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.607, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.255%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.29x versus 5.83x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 19.72%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.55%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $55.2884 which suggests that it could grow by 6.9%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.246%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 33.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.29x versus 7.20x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Target has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 3.33%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Target's return on equity of 31.8%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.55%. On the other hand Target has an analysts' consensus of $141.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.73%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Target, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Target.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.414% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Target has a beta of 1.180, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.031%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.49%. Target offers a yield of 3.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Target pays out 48.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are smaller than Target quarterly revenues of $25.7B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Target's net income of $854M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.54x while Target's PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.29x versus 0.57x for Target. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.