CMS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Consolidated Edison has a net margin of 14.52% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 14.37%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59% beat Consolidated Edison's return on equity of 8.59%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $71.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Consolidated Edison has an analysts' consensus of $99.88 which suggests that it could grow by 10.94%. Given that Consolidated Edison has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Consolidated Edison is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.391% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Consolidated Edison has a beta of 0.363, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.696%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Consolidated Edison offers a yield of 3.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. CMS Energy pays 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Consolidated Edison pays out 43.51% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Consolidated Edison quarterly revenues of $4.1B. CMS Energy's net income of $253M is lower than Consolidated Edison's net income of $588M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while Consolidated Edison's PE ratio is 16.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.64x versus 2.08x for Consolidated Edison. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 14.52% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 24.48%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.88%.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $71.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $87.15 which suggests that it could grow by 21.59%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.391% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.561, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.93%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. CMS Energy pays 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 51.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $7.6B. CMS Energy's net income of $253M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.9B. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 21.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.64x versus 5.62x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 14.52% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 30.27%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $71.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.65%. Given that Talen Energy has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Talen Energy is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.391% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CMS Energy pays 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CMS Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. CMS Energy's net income of $253M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.64x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 14.52% compared to CMS Energy's net margin of 30.03%. CMS Energy's return on equity of 12.59% beat Vistra's return on equity of --.

CMS Energy has a consensus price target of $71.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.35%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $160.46 which suggests that it could grow by 14.66%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than CMS Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than CMS Energy.

CMS Energy has a beta of 0.416, which suggesting that the stock is 58.391% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.026%.

CMS Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.09%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. CMS Energy pays 65.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 31.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CMS Energy quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $6.3B. CMS Energy's net income of $253M is lower than Vistra's net income of $1.9B. Notably, CMS Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.09x while Vistra's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CMS Energy is 2.64x versus -- for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.