AEE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Entergy has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 10.47%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Entergy's return on equity of 7.14%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.94, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Entergy has an analysts' consensus of $89.01 which suggests that it could grow by 8.23%. Given that Entergy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Entergy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Entergy has a beta of 0.560, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.975%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Entergy offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Entergy pays out 94.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Entergy quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than Entergy's net income of $287.2M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Entergy's PE ratio is 33.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.44x versus 2.99x for Entergy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exelon has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 11.83%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Exelon's return on equity of 9.35%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.94, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $45.53 which suggests that it could fall by -2.1%. Given that Ameren has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Ameren is more attractive than Exelon.

Ameren has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.692%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than Exelon's net income of $647M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Exelon's PE ratio is 18.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.44x versus 2.03x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NextEra Energy has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 22.34%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat NextEra Energy's return on equity of 11.64%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.94, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand NextEra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $83.27 which suggests that it could grow by 26.86%. Given that NextEra Energy has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe NextEra Energy is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NextEra Energy has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.514%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. NextEra Energy offers a yield of 3.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. NextEra Energy pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than NextEra Energy quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than NextEra Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while NextEra Energy's PE ratio is 19.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.44x versus 5.46x for NextEra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Ameren's net margin of 10.92%. Ameren's return on equity of 10.03% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

Ameren has a consensus price target of $100.94, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $167.67 which suggests that it could grow by 44.7%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Ameren, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Ameren.

Ameren has a beta of 0.454, which suggesting that the stock is 54.589% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.619%.

Ameren has a quarterly dividend of $0.71 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.78%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Ameren pays 60.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ameren quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. Ameren's net income of $207M is lower than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, Ameren's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.17x while Vistra's PE ratio is 16.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ameren is 3.44x versus 2.36x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.