CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of --. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $379.81, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Cummins has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 23.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2219.914%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.13x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.28x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 11.03%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $379.81, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $111.72 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than PACCAR.

Cummins has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.957, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.336%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Cummins's net income of $418M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.13x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.28x versus 1.52x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REV Group has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 3.47%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat REV Group's return on equity of 21.81%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $379.81, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand REV Group has an analysts' consensus of $34.88 which suggests that it could grow by 10.36%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than REV Group.

Cummins has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REV Group has a beta of 1.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.572%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. REV Group offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group pays out 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than REV Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than REV Group's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.13x while REV Group's PE ratio is 17.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.28x versus 0.72x for REV Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 8.21%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $379.81, signalling upside risk potential of 21.18%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 18.62%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Cummins has a beta of 1.076, which suggesting that the stock is 7.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.234%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.13x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 30.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.28x versus 3.05x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.