AON Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 7.16%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 107.55% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $383.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.82%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $224.53 which suggests that it could grow by 24.06%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Aon PLC, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Aon PLC.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Allstate offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Aon PLC pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Aon PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Aon PLC's net income of $343M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.49x while Allstate's PE ratio is 11.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.88x versus 0.77x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 24.7%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 107.55% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $383.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.82%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Cincinnati Financial has higher upside potential than Aon PLC, analysts believe Cincinnati Financial is more attractive than Aon PLC.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.544%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. Aon PLC pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Aon PLC's net income of $343M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.49x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 6.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.88x versus 1.76x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 9.69%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 107.55% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity of 288.18%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $383.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.82%. On the other hand Goosehead Insurance has an analysts' consensus of $110.10 which suggests that it could grow by 11.68%. Given that Goosehead Insurance has higher upside potential than Aon PLC, analysts believe Goosehead Insurance is more attractive than Aon PLC.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.058%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Goosehead Insurance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aon PLC pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out 77.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Goosehead Insurance quarterly revenues of $78M. Aon PLC's net income of $343M is higher than Goosehead Insurance's net income of $7.6M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.49x while Goosehead Insurance's PE ratio is 136.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.88x versus 12.15x for Goosehead Insurance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.22% compared to Aon PLC's net margin of 8.89%. Aon PLC's return on equity of 107.55% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.

Aon PLC has a consensus price target of $383.82, signalling upside risk potential of 9.82%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.15%. Given that Aon PLC has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Aon PLC is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Aon PLC has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.281% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.686%.

Aon PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Aon PLC pays 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Aon PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Aon PLC quarterly revenues are $3.7B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. Aon PLC's net income of $343M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, Aon PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.49x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aon PLC is 4.88x versus 1.06x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.