Is Okta a Good Stock to Buy?
Okta (NASDAQ:OKTA) is used by some of the largest firms…
Sell
1
VLNVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$25.97
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$25.97 - $25.97
52-week range:
$25.97 - $25.97
Dividend yield:
16.78%
P/E ratio:
7.82x
P/S ratio:
1.44x
P/B ratio:
0.77x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$1.1B
Revenue:
$776.6M
EPS (TTM):
$3.32
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VLNVF
Van Lanschot Kempen NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AAVMY
ABN AMRO Bank NV
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
AEG
Aegon
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $6.91 |
|
CNCK
Coincheck Group NV
|
$874M | -- | 27.92% | -- | $9.98 |
|
FLTLF
Flow Traders
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ING
ING Groep NV
|
$6B | -- | -1.59% | -- | $19.40 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VLNVF
Van Lanschot Kempen NV
|
$25.97 | -- | $1.1B | 7.82x | $2.17 | 16.78% | 1.44x |
|
AAVMY
ABN AMRO Bank NV
|
$18.63 | -- | $15.5B | 6.36x | $0.66 | 8.73% | 1.62x |
|
AEG
Aegon
|
$5.75 | $6.91 | $9.2B | 14.60x | $0.18 | 6.07% | 0.55x |
|
CNCK
Coincheck Group NV
|
$4.47 | $9.98 | $579.8M | 5,535.43x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.23x |
|
FLTLF
Flow Traders
|
$31.29 | -- | $1.3B | 8.21x | $0.16 | 0.51% | 2.19x |
|
ING
ING Groep NV
|
$17.36 | $19.40 | $52.8B | 8.06x | $0.17 | 7.85% | 2.28x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VLNVF
Van Lanschot Kempen NV
|
61.23% | 0.250 | 205.65% | 23.47x |
|
AAVMY
ABN AMRO Bank NV
|
75.75% | -0.404 | 662.92% | 124.21x |
|
AEG
Aegon
|
34.22% | 0.376 | 51.17% | 16.06x |
|
CNCK
Coincheck Group NV
|
85.99% | 0.000 | 30.38% | 0.01x |
|
FLTLF
Flow Traders
|
71.9% | -0.920 | 209.87% | 1.11x |
|
ING
ING Groep NV
|
77.19% | -0.412 | 357.42% | 39.37x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VLNVF
Van Lanschot Kempen NV
|
-- | -- | 4.04% | 10.51% | -- | -- |
|
AAVMY
ABN AMRO Bank NV
|
-- | -- | 2.4% | 9.53% | 133.96% | -$6.6B |
|
AEG
Aegon
|
-- | -- | 3.17% | 7.31% | -- | -- |
|
CNCK
Coincheck Group NV
|
$31.4M | -$10.7M | -23.47% | -112.93% | -12.11% | -$4.3M |
|
FLTLF
Flow Traders
|
-- | -- | 5.45% | 24.06% | 48.9% | -- |
|
ING
ING Groep NV
|
-- | -- | 3% | 12.26% | 32.75% | -- |
Van Lanschot Kempen NV vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns VLNVF or AAVMY?
ABN AMRO Bank NV has a net margin of -- compared to Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net margin of 17.86%. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51% beat ABN AMRO Bank NV's return on equity of 9.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV-- -- $3.7B AAVMYABN AMRO Bank NV-- $0.46 $112B -
What do Analysts Say About VLNVF or AAVMY?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABN AMRO Bank NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Van Lanschot Kempen NV has higher upside potential than ABN AMRO Bank NV, analysts believe Van Lanschot Kempen NV is more attractive than ABN AMRO Bank NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV0 0 0 AAVMYABN AMRO Bank NV0 0 0 -
Is VLNVF or AAVMY More Risky?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABN AMRO Bank NV has a beta of 0.553, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.709%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLNVF or AAVMY?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. ABN AMRO Bank NV offers a yield of 8.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. ABN AMRO Bank NV pays out 51.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VLNVF or AAVMY?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ABN AMRO Bank NV quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of -- is lower than ABN AMRO Bank NV's net income of $423.2M. Notably, Van Lanschot Kempen NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while ABN AMRO Bank NV's PE ratio is 6.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Van Lanschot Kempen NV is 1.44x versus 1.62x for ABN AMRO Bank NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV1.44x 7.82x -- -- AAVMYABN AMRO Bank NV1.62x 6.36x $2.4B $423.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns VLNVF or AEG?
Aegon has a net margin of -- compared to Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net margin of --. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51% beat Aegon's return on equity of 7.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV-- -- $3.7B AEGAegon-- -- $14.7B -
What do Analysts Say About VLNVF or AEG?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Aegon has an analysts' consensus of $6.91 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Aegon has higher upside potential than Van Lanschot Kempen NV, analysts believe Aegon is more attractive than Van Lanschot Kempen NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV0 0 0 AEGAegon1 1 0 -
Is VLNVF or AEG More Risky?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aegon has a beta of 0.828, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.221%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLNVF or AEG?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. Aegon offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Aegon pays out 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VLNVF or AEG?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Aegon quarterly revenues of --. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of -- is lower than Aegon's net income of --. Notably, Van Lanschot Kempen NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Aegon's PE ratio is 14.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Van Lanschot Kempen NV is 1.44x versus 0.55x for Aegon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV1.44x 7.82x -- -- AEGAegon0.55x 14.60x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns VLNVF or CNCK?
Coincheck Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net margin of -12.55%. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51% beat Coincheck Group NV's return on equity of -112.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV-- -- $3.7B CNCKCoincheck Group NV3.89% -$0.78 $407.4M -
What do Analysts Say About VLNVF or CNCK?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Coincheck Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $9.98 which suggests that it could grow by 123.36%. Given that Coincheck Group NV has higher upside potential than Van Lanschot Kempen NV, analysts believe Coincheck Group NV is more attractive than Van Lanschot Kempen NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV0 0 0 CNCKCoincheck Group NV1 0 0 -
Is VLNVF or CNCK More Risky?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coincheck Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLNVF or CNCK?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. Coincheck Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Coincheck Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VLNVF or CNCK?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coincheck Group NV quarterly revenues of $807.1M. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of -- is lower than Coincheck Group NV's net income of -$101.3M. Notably, Van Lanschot Kempen NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Coincheck Group NV's PE ratio is 5,535.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Van Lanschot Kempen NV is 1.44x versus 0.23x for Coincheck Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV1.44x 7.82x -- -- CNCKCoincheck Group NV0.23x 5,535.43x $807.1M -$101.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns VLNVF or FLTLF?
Flow Traders has a net margin of -- compared to Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net margin of 39.92%. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51% beat Flow Traders's return on equity of 24.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV-- -- $3.7B FLTLFFlow Traders-- $1.51 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About VLNVF or FLTLF?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Flow Traders has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Van Lanschot Kempen NV has higher upside potential than Flow Traders, analysts believe Van Lanschot Kempen NV is more attractive than Flow Traders.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV0 0 0 FLTLFFlow Traders0 0 0 -
Is VLNVF or FLTLF More Risky?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flow Traders has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLNVF or FLTLF?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. Flow Traders offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Flow Traders pays out 4.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VLNVF or FLTLF?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flow Traders quarterly revenues of $168.7M. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of -- is lower than Flow Traders's net income of $67.4M. Notably, Van Lanschot Kempen NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while Flow Traders's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Van Lanschot Kempen NV is 1.44x versus 2.19x for Flow Traders. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV1.44x 7.82x -- -- FLTLFFlow Traders2.19x 8.21x $168.7M $67.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns VLNVF or ING?
ING Groep NV has a net margin of -- compared to Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net margin of 21.34%. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51% beat ING Groep NV's return on equity of 12.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV-- -- $3.7B INGING Groep NV-- $0.39 $230.5B -
What do Analysts Say About VLNVF or ING?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ING Groep NV has an analysts' consensus of $19.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that ING Groep NV has higher upside potential than Van Lanschot Kempen NV, analysts believe ING Groep NV is more attractive than Van Lanschot Kempen NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV0 0 0 INGING Groep NV0 2 0 -
Is VLNVF or ING More Risky?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ING Groep NV has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.388%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VLNVF or ING?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 16.78%. ING Groep NV offers a yield of 7.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. ING Groep NV pays out 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VLNVF or ING?
Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ING Groep NV quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of -- is lower than ING Groep NV's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Van Lanschot Kempen NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.82x while ING Groep NV's PE ratio is 8.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Van Lanschot Kempen NV is 1.44x versus 2.28x for ING Groep NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VLNVFVan Lanschot Kempen NV1.44x 7.82x -- -- INGING Groep NV2.28x 8.06x $5.8B $1.2B
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Fidelity High Dividend ETF a Good Investment Now?
Fidelity’s High Dividend ETF (FDVV) is a fund that offers…
Is Kinder Morgan Dividend Yield Worth It?
Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) is a major energy infrastructure company in…
Stock Ideas
Sell
37
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 31x
Sell
37
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 30x
Sell
31
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.3T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
45
RGC alert for Apr 5
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 32.59% over the past day.
Sell
25
GDXU alert for Apr 5
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is down 27.33% over the past day.
Buy
76
SOXS alert for Apr 5
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares [SOXS] is up 23.96% over the past day.
