AEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coincheck Group NV has a net margin of -- compared to Aegon's net margin of -12.55%. Aegon's return on equity of 7.31% beat Coincheck Group NV's return on equity of -112.93%.

Aegon has a consensus price target of $6.91, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Coincheck Group NV has an analysts' consensus of $9.98 which suggests that it could grow by 123.36%. Given that Coincheck Group NV has higher upside potential than Aegon, analysts believe Coincheck Group NV is more attractive than Aegon.

Aegon has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.221% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coincheck Group NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aegon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Coincheck Group NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aegon pays 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Coincheck Group NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aegon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aegon quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Coincheck Group NV quarterly revenues of $807.1M. Aegon's net income of -- is lower than Coincheck Group NV's net income of -$101.3M. Notably, Aegon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Coincheck Group NV's PE ratio is 5,535.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aegon is 0.55x versus 0.23x for Coincheck Group NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flow Traders has a net margin of -- compared to Aegon's net margin of 39.92%. Aegon's return on equity of 7.31% beat Flow Traders's return on equity of 24.06%.

Aegon has a consensus price target of $6.91, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Flow Traders has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aegon has higher upside potential than Flow Traders, analysts believe Aegon is more attractive than Flow Traders.

Aegon has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.221% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flow Traders has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aegon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Flow Traders offers a yield of 0.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Aegon pays 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Flow Traders pays out 4.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aegon quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Flow Traders quarterly revenues of $168.7M. Aegon's net income of -- is lower than Flow Traders's net income of $67.4M. Notably, Aegon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Flow Traders's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aegon is 0.55x versus 2.19x for Flow Traders. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ING Groep NV has a net margin of -- compared to Aegon's net margin of 21.34%. Aegon's return on equity of 7.31% beat ING Groep NV's return on equity of 12.26%.

Aegon has a consensus price target of $6.91, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand ING Groep NV has an analysts' consensus of $19.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.75%. Given that Aegon has higher upside potential than ING Groep NV, analysts believe Aegon is more attractive than ING Groep NV.

Aegon has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.221% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ING Groep NV has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.388%.

Aegon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. ING Groep NV offers a yield of 7.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Aegon pays 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. ING Groep NV pays out 60.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aegon quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ING Groep NV quarterly revenues of $5.8B. Aegon's net income of -- is lower than ING Groep NV's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Aegon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while ING Groep NV's PE ratio is 8.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aegon is 0.55x versus 2.28x for ING Groep NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a net margin of -- compared to Aegon's net margin of --. Aegon's return on equity of 7.31% beat Van Lanschot Kempen NV's return on equity of 10.51%.

Aegon has a consensus price target of $6.91, signalling upside risk potential of 20.16%. On the other hand Van Lanschot Kempen NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Aegon has higher upside potential than Van Lanschot Kempen NV, analysts believe Aegon is more attractive than Van Lanschot Kempen NV.

Aegon has a beta of 0.828, which suggesting that the stock is 17.221% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Van Lanschot Kempen NV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aegon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.07%. Van Lanschot Kempen NV offers a yield of 16.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.17 per share. Aegon pays 75.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Van Lanschot Kempen NV pays out 66.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aegon quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Van Lanschot Kempen NV quarterly revenues of --. Aegon's net income of -- is lower than Van Lanschot Kempen NV's net income of --. Notably, Aegon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.60x while Van Lanschot Kempen NV's PE ratio is 7.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aegon is 0.55x versus 1.44x for Van Lanschot Kempen NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.