SXYAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clariant AG has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07% beat Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Clariant AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Clariant AG, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Clariant AG.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.839% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.145%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Clariant AG offers a yield of 4.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Sika AG pays 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG pays out 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Clariant AG quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Clariant AG's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.58x while Clariant AG's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.71x versus 0.67x for Clariant AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07% beat Ems-Chemie Holding AG's return on equity of 23.25%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ems-Chemie Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Ems-Chemie Holding AG, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Ems-Chemie Holding AG.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.839% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ems-Chemie Holding AG has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.184%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Ems-Chemie Holding AG offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $18.49 per share. Sika AG pays 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Ems-Chemie Holding AG pays out 81.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ems-Chemie Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Ems-Chemie Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.58x while Ems-Chemie Holding AG's PE ratio is 34.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.71x versus 7.77x for Ems-Chemie Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.06%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.839% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.08%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Sika AG pays 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 57.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.58x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 33.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.71x versus 4.94x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Sika AG's net margin of --. Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.63%.

Sika AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sika AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Sika AG is more attractive than Holcim.

Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.839% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.169%.

Sika AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Holcim offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Sika AG pays 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 53.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sika AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Sika AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Sika AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.58x while Holcim's PE ratio is 16.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sika AG is 2.71x versus 1.85x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.