CLZNY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Glencore PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Glencore PLC's return on equity of -4.47%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Glencore PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Glencore PLC, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Glencore PLC.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.145% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Glencore PLC has a beta of 1.006, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.569%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Glencore PLC offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Glencore PLC pays out -96.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Clariant AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Glencore PLC quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Glencore PLC's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Glencore PLC's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.71x versus 0.18x for Glencore PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Givaudan SA has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Givaudan SA's return on equity of 25.06%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Givaudan SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Givaudan SA, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Givaudan SA.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.145% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Givaudan SA has a beta of 0.799, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.08%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Givaudan SA offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.58 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Givaudan SA pays out 57.52% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Givaudan SA quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Givaudan SA's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Givaudan SA's PE ratio is 34.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.71x versus 5.14x for Givaudan SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Holcim has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Holcim's return on equity of 10.63%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Holcim has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Holcim, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Holcim.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.145% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Holcim has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.169%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Holcim offers a yield of 2.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Holcim pays out 53.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Holcim quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Holcim's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Holcim's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.71x versus 1.98x for Holcim. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sika AG has a net margin of -- compared to Clariant AG's net margin of --. Clariant AG's return on equity of 10.24% beat Sika AG's return on equity of 19.07%.

Clariant AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sika AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Clariant AG has higher upside potential than Sika AG, analysts believe Clariant AG is more attractive than Sika AG.

Clariant AG has a beta of 0.749, which suggesting that the stock is 25.145% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sika AG has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.839%.

Clariant AG has a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.68%. Sika AG offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Clariant AG pays 56.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Sika AG pays out 21.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clariant AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sika AG quarterly revenues of --. Clariant AG's net income of -- is lower than Sika AG's net income of --. Notably, Clariant AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.14x while Sika AG's PE ratio is 27.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clariant AG is 0.71x versus 2.94x for Sika AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.