How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Buy
52
NESRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$10.71
Seasonality move
:
18.77%
Day range:
$9.30 - $10.71
52-week range:
$7.69 - $12.18
Dividend yield:
2.5%
P/E ratio:
29.60x
P/S ratio:
3.85x
P/B ratio:
2.09x
Volume:
1.1K
Avg. volume:
4.6K
1-year change:
21.98%
Market cap:
$12.3B
Revenue:
$3.2B
EPS (TTM):
$0.36
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NESRF
Northern Star Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $55.80 |
|
DGMLF
De Grey Mining
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NESRF
Northern Star Resources
|
$10.71 | -- | $12.3B | 29.60x | $0.17 | 2.5% | 3.85x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$49.35 | $55.80 | $125.1B | 15.87x | $1.48 | 5.92% | 2.25x |
|
DGMLF
De Grey Mining
|
$1.13 | -- | $2.1B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 64,840.02x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.82 | -- | $58.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.12 | -- | $42.9M | 47.38x | $0.01 | 165.95% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NESRF
Northern Star Resources
|
11.87% | -0.606 | 8.05% | 1.67x |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
28.87% | 0.884 | 11.7% | 1.27x |
|
DGMLF
De Grey Mining
|
-- | -0.174 | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
9.38% | 0.068 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | 4.553 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NESRF
Northern Star Resources
|
-- | -- | 6.37% | 7.28% | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 16.54% | -- | -- |
|
DGMLF
De Grey Mining
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Northern Star Resources vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NESRF or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Star Resources's net margin of --. Northern Star Resources's return on equity of 7.28% beat BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NESRFNorthern Star Resources-- -- $6.7B BHPBHP Group-- -- $66.7B -
What do Analysts Say About NESRF or BHP?
Northern Star Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $55.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.07%. Given that BHP Group has higher upside potential than Northern Star Resources, analysts believe BHP Group is more attractive than Northern Star Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NESRFNorthern Star Resources0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is NESRF or BHP More Risky?
Northern Star Resources has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NESRF or BHP?
Northern Star Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. Northern Star Resources pays 52.26% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NESRF or BHP?
Northern Star Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Northern Star Resources's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Northern Star Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while BHP Group's PE ratio is 15.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Star Resources is 3.85x versus 2.25x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NESRFNorthern Star Resources3.85x 29.60x -- -- BHPBHP Group2.25x 15.87x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NESRF or DGMLF?
De Grey Mining has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Star Resources's net margin of --. Northern Star Resources's return on equity of 7.28% beat De Grey Mining's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NESRFNorthern Star Resources-- -- $6.7B DGMLFDe Grey Mining-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NESRF or DGMLF?
Northern Star Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand De Grey Mining has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Star Resources has higher upside potential than De Grey Mining, analysts believe Northern Star Resources is more attractive than De Grey Mining.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NESRFNorthern Star Resources0 0 0 DGMLFDe Grey Mining0 0 0 -
Is NESRF or DGMLF More Risky?
Northern Star Resources has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison De Grey Mining has a beta of -0.029, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.865%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NESRF or DGMLF?
Northern Star Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. De Grey Mining offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Star Resources pays 52.26% of its earnings as a dividend. De Grey Mining pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Star Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NESRF or DGMLF?
Northern Star Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than De Grey Mining quarterly revenues of --. Northern Star Resources's net income of -- is lower than De Grey Mining's net income of --. Notably, Northern Star Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while De Grey Mining's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Star Resources is 3.85x versus 64,840.02x for De Grey Mining. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NESRFNorthern Star Resources3.85x 29.60x -- -- DGMLFDe Grey Mining64,840.02x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NESRF or FTZZF?
Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Star Resources's net margin of --. Northern Star Resources's return on equity of 7.28% beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NESRFNorthern Star Resources-- -- $6.7B FTZZFFertoz-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NESRF or FTZZF?
Northern Star Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Star Resources has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Northern Star Resources is more attractive than Fertoz.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NESRFNorthern Star Resources0 0 0 FTZZFFertoz0 0 0 -
Is NESRF or FTZZF More Risky?
Northern Star Resources has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NESRF or FTZZF?
Northern Star Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Star Resources pays 52.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Star Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NESRF or FTZZF?
Northern Star Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Northern Star Resources's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Northern Star Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Star Resources is 3.85x versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NESRFNorthern Star Resources3.85x 29.60x -- -- FTZZFFertoz1.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NESRF or NVA?
Nova Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Star Resources's net margin of --. Northern Star Resources's return on equity of 7.28% beat Nova Minerals's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NESRFNorthern Star Resources-- -- $6.7B NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NESRF or NVA?
Northern Star Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nova Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 95.01%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Northern Star Resources, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Northern Star Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NESRFNorthern Star Resources0 0 0 NVANova Minerals0 0 0 -
Is NESRF or NVA More Risky?
Northern Star Resources has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NESRF or NVA?
Northern Star Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Nova Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Star Resources pays 52.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Nova Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Star Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NESRF or NVA?
Northern Star Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nova Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Northern Star Resources's net income of -- is lower than Nova Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Northern Star Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Nova Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Star Resources is 3.85x versus -- for Nova Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NESRFNorthern Star Resources3.85x 29.60x -- -- NVANova Minerals-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NESRF or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Northern Star Resources's net margin of --. Northern Star Resources's return on equity of 7.28% beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NESRFNorthern Star Resources-- -- $6.7B SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NESRF or SBMSF?
Northern Star Resources has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Star Resources has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Northern Star Resources is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NESRFNorthern Star Resources0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is NESRF or SBMSF More Risky?
Northern Star Resources has a beta of 1.210, which suggesting that the stock is 20.97% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NESRF or SBMSF?
Northern Star Resources has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.5%. Danakali offers a yield of 165.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Northern Star Resources pays 52.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Star Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NESRF or SBMSF?
Northern Star Resources quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Northern Star Resources's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Northern Star Resources's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.60x while Danakali's PE ratio is 47.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Star Resources is 3.85x versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NESRFNorthern Star Resources3.85x 29.60x -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 47.38x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is up 10.88% over the past day.
