Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
60
NVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$12.60
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$11.59 - $12.67
52-week range:
$4.35 - $12.67
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
0.95x
Volume:
60.7K
Avg. volume:
43.7K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$57.7M
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
-$3.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $55.80 |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
$12.60 | -- | $57.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
$49.20 | $55.80 | $124.7B | 15.82x | $1.48 | 5.94% | 2.24x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
$0.0070 | -- | $2.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.18x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
$0.06 | -- | $16.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.89x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm
|
$2.34 | -- | $896M | 105.86x | $0.03 | 2.54% | 0.40x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
$0.11 | -- | $42M | 46.32x | $0.01 | 169.74% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
28.87% | 0.884 | 11.7% | 1.27x |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
9.38% | 0.068 | 6.83% | 1.16x |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
38.76% | 0.000 | 18.45% | 0.44x |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm
|
30.08% | 0.553 | 61.93% | 1.07x |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | 4.553 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NVA
Nova Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BHP
BHP Group
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 16.54% | -- | -- |
|
FTZZF
Fertoz
|
-- | -- | -24.73% | -26.41% | -- | -- |
|
HMIFF
Harvest Minerals
|
-- | -- | -33.72% | -45.85% | -- | -- |
|
NUFMF
Nufarm
|
-- | -- | -0.19% | -0.29% | -- | -- |
|
SBMSF
Danakali
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Nova Minerals vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or BHP?
BHP Group has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat BHP Group's return on equity of 16.54%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- BHPBHP Group-- -- $66.7B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand BHP Group has an analysts' consensus of $55.80 which suggests that it could grow by 13.42%. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than BHP Group, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than BHP Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 BHPBHP Group3 3 0 -
Is NVA or BHP More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BHP Group has a beta of 0.954, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.618%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BHP Group offers a yield of 5.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group pays out 97.19% of its earnings as a dividend. BHP Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or BHP?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BHP Group quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than BHP Group's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BHP Group's PE ratio is 15.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 2.24x for BHP Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- BHPBHP Group2.24x 15.82x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or FTZZF?
Fertoz has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Fertoz's return on equity of -26.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- FTZZFFertoz-- -- $7.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Fertoz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Fertoz, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Fertoz.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 FTZZFFertoz0 0 0 -
Is NVA or FTZZF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fertoz has a beta of -0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.613%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fertoz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fertoz pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or FTZZF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fertoz quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Fertoz's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fertoz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 1.18x for Fertoz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- FTZZFFertoz1.18x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or HMIFF?
Harvest Minerals has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Harvest Minerals's return on equity of -45.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals-- -- $5.2M -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or HMIFF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Harvest Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Harvest Minerals, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Harvest Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 HMIFFHarvest Minerals0 0 0 -
Is NVA or HMIFF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvest Minerals has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or HMIFF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvest Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvest Minerals pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or HMIFF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Harvest Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Harvest Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvest Minerals's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 4.89x for Harvest Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- HMIFFHarvest Minerals4.89x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or NUFMF?
Nufarm has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Nufarm's return on equity of -0.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- NUFMFNufarm-- -- $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Nufarm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Nufarm, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Nufarm.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 NUFMFNufarm0 0 0 -
Is NVA or NUFMF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nufarm has a beta of -0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.224%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nufarm offers a yield of 2.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nufarm pays out -951.72% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or NUFMF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nufarm quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Nufarm's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nufarm's PE ratio is 105.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus 0.40x for Nufarm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- NUFMFNufarm0.40x 105.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NVA or SBMSF?
Danakali has a net margin of -- compared to Nova Minerals's net margin of --. Nova Minerals's return on equity of -- beat Danakali's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NVANova Minerals-- -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Danakali has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nova Minerals has higher upside potential than Danakali, analysts believe Nova Minerals is more attractive than Danakali.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NVANova Minerals0 0 0 SBMSFDanakali0 0 0 -
Is NVA or SBMSF More Risky?
Nova Minerals has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Danakali has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Danakali offers a yield of 169.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Nova Minerals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Danakali pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NVA or SBMSF?
Nova Minerals quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Danakali quarterly revenues of --. Nova Minerals's net income of -- is lower than Danakali's net income of --. Notably, Nova Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Danakali's PE ratio is 46.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nova Minerals is -- versus -- for Danakali. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NVANova Minerals-- -- -- -- SBMSFDanakali-- 46.32x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
