MJWL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Arista Power has a net margin of -- compared to Majic Wheels's net margin of --. Majic Wheels's return on equity of -- beat Arista Power's return on equity of --.

Majic Wheels has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Arista Power has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Majic Wheels has higher upside potential than Arista Power, analysts believe Majic Wheels is more attractive than Arista Power.

Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, which suggesting that the stock is 3704.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arista Power has a beta of 27.373, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2637.342%.

Majic Wheels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Arista Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Majic Wheels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Arista Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Majic Wheels quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Arista Power quarterly revenues of --. Majic Wheels's net income of -- is lower than Arista Power's net income of --. Notably, Majic Wheels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Arista Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Majic Wheels is -- versus 0.00x for Arista Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FuelCell Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Majic Wheels's net margin of -137.84%. Majic Wheels's return on equity of -- beat FuelCell Energy's return on equity of -15.42%.

Majic Wheels has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FuelCell Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.02 which suggests that it could fall by -3.83%. Given that FuelCell Energy has higher upside potential than Majic Wheels, analysts believe FuelCell Energy is more attractive than Majic Wheels.

Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, which suggesting that the stock is 3704.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FuelCell Energy has a beta of 3.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 264.091%.

Majic Wheels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. FuelCell Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Majic Wheels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FuelCell Energy pays out -2.98% of its earnings as a dividend.

Majic Wheels quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FuelCell Energy quarterly revenues of $23.7M. Majic Wheels's net income of -- is lower than FuelCell Energy's net income of -$32.7M. Notably, Majic Wheels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FuelCell Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Majic Wheels is -- versus 1.89x for FuelCell Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OriginClear has a net margin of -- compared to Majic Wheels's net margin of -241842.13%. Majic Wheels's return on equity of -- beat OriginClear's return on equity of --.

Majic Wheels has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OriginClear has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 499900.57%. Given that OriginClear has higher upside potential than Majic Wheels, analysts believe OriginClear is more attractive than Majic Wheels.

Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, which suggesting that the stock is 3704.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OriginClear has a beta of 0.952, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.779%.

Majic Wheels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OriginClear offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Majic Wheels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OriginClear pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Majic Wheels quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than OriginClear quarterly revenues of $6.6K. Majic Wheels's net income of -- is lower than OriginClear's net income of -$2.8M. Notably, Majic Wheels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while OriginClear's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Majic Wheels is -- versus 198.13x for OriginClear. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Majic Wheels's net margin of 8.77%. Majic Wheels's return on equity of -- beat Perma-Pipe International Holdings's return on equity of 22.41%.

Majic Wheels has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Perma-Pipe International Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Majic Wheels has higher upside potential than Perma-Pipe International Holdings, analysts believe Majic Wheels is more attractive than Perma-Pipe International Holdings.

Majic Wheels has a beta of 38.050, which suggesting that the stock is 3704.975% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Pipe International Holdings has a beta of 0.317, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.271%.

Majic Wheels has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Pipe International Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Majic Wheels pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Pipe International Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Majic Wheels quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perma-Pipe International Holdings quarterly revenues of $37.5M. Majic Wheels's net income of -- is lower than Perma-Pipe International Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Majic Wheels's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Pipe International Holdings's PE ratio is 7.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Majic Wheels is -- versus 0.68x for Perma-Pipe International Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.