Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
18
LQMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.04
Seasonality move
:
6.94%
Day range:
$0.04 - $0.04
52-week range:
$0.04 - $0.08
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
37.16x
P/B ratio:
1.26x
Volume:
670.9K
Avg. volume:
621K
1-year change:
-34.08%
Market cap:
$37.8M
Revenue:
$510K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$484.9M | $0.26 | -1.1% | -10.93% | $27.38 |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$121.4M | $0.32 | -3.94% | 18.52% | -- |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
$0.04 | -- | $37.8M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 37.16x |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$24.58 | $27.38 | $1.9B | 19.20x | $0.20 | 3.26% | 0.96x |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
$207.50 | -- | $250.8M | -- | $0.23 | 0.41% | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
$0.0200 | -- | $55K | -- | $0.28 | 0% | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$40.72 | -- | $998.1M | 43.32x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.06x |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
$0.05 | -- | $1.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
-- | 1.403 | -- | 12.96x |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
31.88% | 1.467 | 29.07% | 1.01x |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -0.781 | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | 42.741 | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
-- | 3.405 | -- | 3.17x |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -0.905 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQMT
Liquidmetal Technologies
|
$77K | -$832K | -4.28% | -4.28% | -263.29% | $8K |
|
KMT
Kennametal
|
$151M | $36.6M | 5.29% | 7.75% | 7.82% | $21M |
|
MUEL
Paul Mueller
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRAC
Productivity Technologies
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PRLB
Proto Labs
|
$57.2M | $8.6M | 3.49% | 3.49% | 6.83% | $23.2M |
|
RMTO
RM2 International
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Liquidmetal Technologies vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or KMT?
Kennametal has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of 4.59%. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M KMTKennametal31.33% $0.28 $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4754.37%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $27.38 which suggests that it could grow by 11.37%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Kennametal.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 KMTKennametal0 5 1 -
Is LQMT or KMT More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.119%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kennametal offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or KMT?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $481.9M. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is lower than Kennametal's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kennametal's PE ratio is 19.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 37.16x versus 0.96x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies37.16x -- $316K -$440K KMTKennametal0.96x 19.20x $481.9M $22.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or MUEL?
Paul Mueller has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Paul Mueller's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M MUELPaul Mueller-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4754.37%. On the other hand Paul Mueller has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Paul Mueller, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Paul Mueller.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 MUELPaul Mueller0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or MUEL More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paul Mueller has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.534%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paul Mueller offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paul Mueller pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or MUEL?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than Paul Mueller quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than Paul Mueller's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paul Mueller's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 37.16x versus -- for Paul Mueller. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies37.16x -- $316K -$440K MUELPaul Mueller-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or PRAC?
Productivity Technologies has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Productivity Technologies's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M PRACProductivity Technologies-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4754.37%. On the other hand Productivity Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Productivity Technologies, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Productivity Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 PRACProductivity Technologies0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or PRAC More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Productivity Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Productivity Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Productivity Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or PRAC?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than Productivity Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than Productivity Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Productivity Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 37.16x versus -- for Productivity Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies37.16x -- $316K -$440K PRACProductivity Technologies-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or PRLB?
Proto Labs has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of 5.72%. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat Proto Labs's return on equity of 3.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M PRLBProto Labs45.56% $0.29 $680M -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4754.37%. On the other hand Proto Labs has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -5.86%. Given that Liquidmetal Technologies has higher upside potential than Proto Labs, analysts believe Liquidmetal Technologies is more attractive than Proto Labs.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 PRLBProto Labs0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or PRLB More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Proto Labs has a beta of 1.450, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.953%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Proto Labs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Proto Labs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or PRLB?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are smaller than Proto Labs quarterly revenues of $125.6M. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is lower than Proto Labs's net income of $7.2M. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Proto Labs's PE ratio is 43.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 37.16x versus 2.06x for Proto Labs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies37.16x -- $316K -$440K PRLBProto Labs2.06x 43.32x $125.6M $7.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQMT or RMTO?
RM2 International has a net margin of -139.24% compared to Liquidmetal Technologies's net margin of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's return on equity of -4.28% beat RM2 International's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies24.37% -$0.00 $29.8M RMTORM2 International-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4754.37%. On the other hand RM2 International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6229.11%. Given that RM2 International has higher upside potential than Liquidmetal Technologies, analysts believe RM2 International is more attractive than Liquidmetal Technologies.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies0 0 0 RMTORM2 International0 0 0 -
Is LQMT or RMTO More Risky?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a beta of 1.209, which suggesting that the stock is 20.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RM2 International has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.208%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RM2 International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidmetal Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RM2 International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQMT or RMTO?
Liquidmetal Technologies quarterly revenues are $316K, which are larger than RM2 International quarterly revenues of --. Liquidmetal Technologies's net income of -$440K is higher than RM2 International's net income of --. Notably, Liquidmetal Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while RM2 International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidmetal Technologies is 37.16x versus 0.02x for RM2 International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQMTLiquidmetal Technologies37.16x -- $316K -$440K RMTORM2 International0.02x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
