Financhill
Sell
33

KMAAF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$122.35
Seasonality move :
-2.79%
Day range:
$122.35 - $122.35
52-week range:
$122.35 - $243.50
Dividend yield:
2.69%
P/E ratio:
98.56x
P/S ratio:
0.83x
P/B ratio:
1.45x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
7
1-year change:
-49.75%
Market cap:
$626.1M
Revenue:
$845.8M
EPS (TTM):
$1.24

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
-- -- -- -- --
ABBNY
ABB
$8.4B $0.54 2.4% -2.27% $44.37
GBERY
Geberit AG
-- -- -- -- --
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
-- -- -- -- --
SGSOY
SGS AG
-- -- -- -- --
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
$122.35 -- $626.1M 98.56x $3.29 2.69% 0.83x
ABBNY
ABB
$54.69 $44.37 $100.6B 26.17x $0.96 1.76% 3.12x
GBERY
Geberit AG
$57.49 -- $19B 28.66x $1.39 2.42% 5.61x
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
$45.10 -- $26.7B 20.64x $0.39 4.88% 1.00x
SGSOY
SGS AG
$10.09 -- $18.6B 26.65x $0.35 3.46% 2.73x
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
$281.47 -- $30.3B 31.02x $5.65 1.6% 2.47x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
31.46% -1.451 20.19% 1.83x
ABBNY
ABB
32.48% 0.877 6.31% 0.86x
GBERY
Geberit AG
56.43% 1.266 8.7% 0.68x
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
8.35% 1.038 0.98% 0.89x
SGSOY
SGS AG
-- 0.218 -- --
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
-- 0.964 -- 0.43x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
-- -- 1.09% 1.41% -- --
ABBNY
ABB
$3.1B $1.3B 17.93% 27.49% 16.75% $1.1B
GBERY
Geberit AG
-- -- 22.18% 47.19% -- --
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
$2.5B $526.2M 34.31% 37.22% 7.14% $508.3M
SGSOY
SGS AG
-- -- -- -- -- --
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
-- $378.1M 18.45% 19.13% 11.73% $377.5M

Komax Holding AG vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or ABBNY?

    ABB has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 11.62%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat ABB's return on equity of 27.49%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    -- -- $628M
    ABBNY
    ABB
    38.23% $0.51 $21.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or ABBNY?

    Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABB has an analysts' consensus of $44.37 which suggests that it could fall by -0.99%. Given that ABB has higher upside potential than Komax Holding AG, analysts believe ABB is more attractive than Komax Holding AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0 0 0
    ABBNY
    ABB
    0 4 0
  • Is KMAAF or ABBNY More Risky?

    Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABB has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.332%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or ABBNY?

    Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. ABB offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. ABB pays out 45.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or ABBNY?

    Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than ABB quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than ABB's net income of $947M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while ABB's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 3.12x for ABB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0.83x 98.56x -- --
    ABBNY
    ABB
    3.12x 26.17x $8.2B $947M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or GBERY?

    Geberit AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 47.19%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    -- -- $628M
    GBERY
    Geberit AG
    -- -- $3B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or GBERY?

    Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0 0 0
    GBERY
    Geberit AG
    0 0 0
  • Is KMAAF or GBERY More Risky?

    Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.874%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or GBERY?

    Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 68.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or GBERY?

    Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 28.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 5.61x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0.83x 98.56x -- --
    GBERY
    Geberit AG
    5.61x 28.66x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or KHNGY?

    Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 5%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 37.22%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    -- -- $628M
    KHNGY
    Kuehne + Nagel International AG
    33.71% $0.63 $3.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or KHNGY?

    Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0 0 0
    KHNGY
    Kuehne + Nagel International AG
    0 0 0
  • Is KMAAF or KHNGY More Risky?

    Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.365%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or KHNGY?

    Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 116.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kuehne + Nagel International AG's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or KHNGY?

    Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $374.7M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 1.00x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0.83x 98.56x -- --
    KHNGY
    Kuehne + Nagel International AG
    1.00x 20.64x $7.5B $374.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or SGSOY?

    SGS AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of --. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    -- -- $628M
    SGSOY
    SGS AG
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or SGSOY?

    Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0 0 0
    SGSOY
    SGS AG
    0 0 0
  • Is KMAAF or SGSOY More Risky?

    Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.958%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or SGSOY?

    Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or SGSOY?

    Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 2.73x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0.83x 98.56x -- --
    SGSOY
    SGS AG
    2.73x 26.65x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns KMAAF or SHLRF?

    Schindler Holding AG has a net margin of -- compared to Komax Holding AG's net margin of 9.11%. Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41% beat Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    -- -- $628M
    SHLRF
    Schindler Holding AG
    -- $2.50 $5.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About KMAAF or SHLRF?

    Komax Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Schindler Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Komax Holding AG has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe Komax Holding AG is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0 0 0
    SHLRF
    Schindler Holding AG
    0 0 0
  • Is KMAAF or SHLRF More Risky?

    Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, which suggesting that the stock is 126.129% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.04%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KMAAF or SHLRF?

    Komax Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.69%. Schindler Holding AG offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share. Komax Holding AG pays 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG pays out 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KMAAF or SHLRF?

    Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Komax Holding AG's net income of -- is lower than Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M. Notably, Komax Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 98.56x while Schindler Holding AG's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Komax Holding AG is 0.83x versus 2.47x for Schindler Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KMAAF
    Komax Holding AG
    0.83x 98.56x -- --
    SHLRF
    Schindler Holding AG
    2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock