Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Buy
65
SHLRF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$281.47
Seasonality move
:
3.86%
Day range:
$281.47 - $281.47
52-week range:
$219.50 - $296.99
Dividend yield:
1.6%
P/E ratio:
31.02x
P/S ratio:
2.47x
P/B ratio:
5.33x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
25
1-year change:
28.23%
Market cap:
$30.3B
Revenue:
$12.8B
EPS (TTM):
$9.07
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$8.4B | $0.54 | 2.4% | -2.27% | $44.37 |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
$281.47 | -- | $30.3B | 31.02x | $5.65 | 1.6% | 2.47x |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$54.69 | $44.37 | $100.6B | 26.17x | $0.96 | 1.76% | 3.12x |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
$57.49 | -- | $19B | 28.66x | $1.39 | 2.42% | 5.61x |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
$45.10 | -- | $26.7B | 20.64x | $0.39 | 4.88% | 1.00x |
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
$122.35 | -- | $626.1M | 98.56x | $3.29 | 2.69% | 0.83x |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
$10.09 | -- | $18.6B | 26.65x | $0.35 | 3.46% | 2.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | 0.964 | -- | 0.43x |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
32.48% | 0.877 | 6.31% | 0.86x |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
56.43% | 1.266 | 8.7% | 0.68x |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
8.35% | 1.038 | 0.98% | 0.89x |
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
31.46% | -1.451 | 20.19% | 1.83x |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | 0.218 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SHLRF
Schindler Holding AG
|
-- | $378.1M | 18.45% | 19.13% | 11.73% | $377.5M |
|
ABBNY
ABB
|
$3.1B | $1.3B | 17.93% | 27.49% | 16.75% | $1.1B |
|
GBERY
Geberit AG
|
-- | -- | 22.18% | 47.19% | -- | -- |
|
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International AG
|
$2.5B | $526.2M | 34.31% | 37.22% | 7.14% | $508.3M |
|
KMAAF
Komax Holding AG
|
-- | -- | 1.09% | 1.41% | -- | -- |
|
SGSOY
SGS AG
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Schindler Holding AG vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLRF or ABBNY?
ABB has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 11.62%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat ABB's return on equity of 27.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.50 $5.7B ABBNYABB38.23% $0.51 $21.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SHLRF or ABBNY?
Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ABB has an analysts' consensus of $44.37 which suggests that it could fall by -0.99%. Given that ABB has higher upside potential than Schindler Holding AG, analysts believe ABB is more attractive than Schindler Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 ABBNYABB0 4 0 -
Is SHLRF or ABBNY More Risky?
Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ABB has a beta of 1.163, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.332%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLRF or ABBNY?
Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. ABB offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.96 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. ABB pays out 45.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLRF or ABBNY?
Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than ABB quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is lower than ABB's net income of $947M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while ABB's PE ratio is 26.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 3.12x for ABB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLRFSchindler Holding AG2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M ABBNYABB3.12x 26.17x $8.2B $947M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLRF or GBERY?
Geberit AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Geberit AG's return on equity of 47.19%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.50 $5.7B GBERYGeberit AG-- -- $3B -
What do Analysts Say About SHLRF or GBERY?
Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geberit AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Geberit AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Geberit AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 GBERYGeberit AG0 0 0 -
Is SHLRF or GBERY More Risky?
Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geberit AG has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.874%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLRF or GBERY?
Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Geberit AG offers a yield of 2.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Geberit AG pays out 68.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLRF or GBERY?
Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Geberit AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than Geberit AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Geberit AG's PE ratio is 28.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 5.61x for Geberit AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLRFSchindler Holding AG2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M GBERYGeberit AG5.61x 28.66x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLRF or KHNGY?
Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of 5%. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Kuehne + Nagel International AG's return on equity of 37.22%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.50 $5.7B KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG33.71% $0.63 $3.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SHLRF or KHNGY?
Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuehne + Nagel International AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Kuehne + Nagel International AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Kuehne + Nagel International AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG0 0 0 -
Is SHLRF or KHNGY More Risky?
Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuehne + Nagel International AG has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.365%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLRF or KHNGY?
Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Kuehne + Nagel International AG offers a yield of 4.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuehne + Nagel International AG pays out 116.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kuehne + Nagel International AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLRF or KHNGY?
Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Kuehne + Nagel International AG quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is lower than Kuehne + Nagel International AG's net income of $374.7M. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Kuehne + Nagel International AG's PE ratio is 20.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 1.00x for Kuehne + Nagel International AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLRFSchindler Holding AG2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M KHNGYKuehne + Nagel International AG1.00x 20.64x $7.5B $374.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLRF or KMAAF?
Komax Holding AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat Komax Holding AG's return on equity of 1.41%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.50 $5.7B KMAAFKomax Holding AG-- -- $628M -
What do Analysts Say About SHLRF or KMAAF?
Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Komax Holding AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than Komax Holding AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than Komax Holding AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 KMAAFKomax Holding AG0 0 0 -
Is SHLRF or KMAAF More Risky?
Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Komax Holding AG has a beta of -0.261, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.129%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLRF or KMAAF?
Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. Komax Holding AG offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.29 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Komax Holding AG pays out 64.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLRF or KMAAF?
Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Komax Holding AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than Komax Holding AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while Komax Holding AG's PE ratio is 98.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 0.83x for Komax Holding AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLRFSchindler Holding AG2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M KMAAFKomax Holding AG0.83x 98.56x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SHLRF or SGSOY?
SGS AG has a net margin of 9.11% compared to Schindler Holding AG's net margin of --. Schindler Holding AG's return on equity of 19.13% beat SGS AG's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SHLRFSchindler Holding AG-- $2.50 $5.7B SGSOYSGS AG-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SHLRF or SGSOY?
Schindler Holding AG has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SGS AG has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Schindler Holding AG has higher upside potential than SGS AG, analysts believe Schindler Holding AG is more attractive than SGS AG.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SHLRFSchindler Holding AG0 0 0 SGSOYSGS AG0 0 0 -
Is SHLRF or SGSOY More Risky?
Schindler Holding AG has a beta of 0.740, which suggesting that the stock is 26.04% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SGS AG has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.958%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SHLRF or SGSOY?
Schindler Holding AG has a quarterly dividend of $5.65 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.6%. SGS AG offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Schindler Holding AG pays 49.65% of its earnings as a dividend. SGS AG pays out 106.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Schindler Holding AG's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SGS AG's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SHLRF or SGSOY?
Schindler Holding AG quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than SGS AG quarterly revenues of --. Schindler Holding AG's net income of $293.7M is higher than SGS AG's net income of --. Notably, Schindler Holding AG's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.02x while SGS AG's PE ratio is 26.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schindler Holding AG is 2.47x versus 2.73x for SGS AG. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SHLRFSchindler Holding AG2.47x 31.02x $3.2B $293.7M SGSOYSGS AG2.73x 26.65x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
