IMBBF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diageo PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 32.7%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $156.41 which suggests that it could grow by 6.22%. Given that Diageo PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Diageo PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.

Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.691, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.888%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.42x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 3.50x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nomad Foods has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of 9.14%. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nomad Foods has an analysts' consensus of $23.68 which suggests that it could grow by 42.06%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.

Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.785, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.496%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Nomad Foods offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Nomad Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Imperial Brands PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Nomad Foods quarterly revenues of $846.4M. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.42x while Nomad Foods's PE ratio is 12.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 0.82x for Nomad Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unilever PLC has a net margin of -- compared to Imperial Brands PLC's net margin of --. Imperial Brands PLC's return on equity of 44.78% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.75%. Given that Unilever PLC has higher upside potential than Imperial Brands PLC, analysts believe Unilever PLC is more attractive than Imperial Brands PLC.

Imperial Brands PLC has a beta of 0.860, which suggesting that the stock is 13.952% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.480, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.979%.

Imperial Brands PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Imperial Brands PLC pays 49.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Imperial Brands PLC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Imperial Brands PLC's net income of -- is lower than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Imperial Brands PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.42x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Imperial Brands PLC is 0.68x versus 2.22x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.