Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
34
NOMD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.64
Seasonality move
:
3.16%
Day range:
$15.85 - $16.62
52-week range:
$15.85 - $20.05
Dividend yield:
3.75%
P/E ratio:
11.88x
P/S ratio:
0.79x
P/B ratio:
0.86x
Volume:
942K
Avg. volume:
680.7K
1-year change:
-10.61%
Market cap:
$2.6B
Revenue:
$3.3B
EPS (TTM):
$1.35
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods
|
$833.8M | $0.40 | 1.77% | 131.29% | $23.42 |
|
BEDU
Bright Scholar Education Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$5.4B | -- | -- | -- | $80.66 |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $135.14 |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$14.8B | -- | -- | -- | $66.05 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods
|
$16.01 | $23.42 | $2.6B | 11.88x | $0.15 | 3.75% | 0.79x |
|
BEDU
Bright Scholar Education Holdings
|
$1.70 | -- | $50.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.21x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
$36.74 | -- | $81B | -- | $0.74 | 8.17% | 2.50x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
$75.91 | $80.66 | $35B | 20.39x | $1.30 | 2.75% | 1.69x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
$125.44 | $135.14 | $69.7B | 18.39x | $2.52 | 3.3% | 3.46x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
$56.14 | $66.05 | $138.8B | 20.19x | $0.48 | 3.33% | 2.18x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods
|
44.32% | 1.105 | 77.66% | 0.72x |
|
BEDU
Bright Scholar Education Holdings
|
-- | 2.444 | -- | 0.58x |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
42.6% | 0.938 | 73.63% | 0.57x |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
57.33% | 0.227 | 36.05% | 0.57x |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
68.19% | 0.360 | 29.93% | 0.50x |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | 0.385 | -- | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NOMD
Nomad Foods
|
$273M | $150.3M | 4.2% | 7.58% | 16.14% | $91.4M |
|
BEDU
Bright Scholar Education Holdings
|
-$8.9M | -$14.2M | -71.59% | -71.59% | -784.84% | $14.5M |
|
BTI
British American Tobacco PLC
|
-- | -- | -13.43% | -22.5% | -- | -- |
|
CCEP
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC
|
-- | -- | 8.26% | 19.35% | -- | -- |
|
DEO
Diageo PLC
|
-- | -- | 11.7% | 32.7% | -- | -- |
|
UL
Unilever PLC
|
-- | -- | 21.13% | 30.02% | -- | -- |
Nomad Foods vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NOMD or BEDU?
Bright Scholar Education Holdings has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of -922.82%. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58% beat Bright Scholar Education Holdings's return on equity of -71.59%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOMDNomad Foods32.25% $0.48 $5.4B BEDUBright Scholar Education Holdings-60.05% -$4.62 $85.4M -
What do Analysts Say About NOMD or BEDU?
Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 46.28%. On the other hand Bright Scholar Education Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 668.26%. Given that Bright Scholar Education Holdings has higher upside potential than Nomad Foods, analysts believe Bright Scholar Education Holdings is more attractive than Nomad Foods.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOMDNomad Foods6 0 0 BEDUBright Scholar Education Holdings0 0 0 -
Is NOMD or BEDU More Risky?
Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bright Scholar Education Holdings has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.085%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOMD or BEDU?
Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Bright Scholar Education Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nomad Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bright Scholar Education Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOMD or BEDU?
Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $846.4M, which are larger than Bright Scholar Education Holdings quarterly revenues of $14.9M. Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M is higher than Bright Scholar Education Holdings's net income of -$137.3M. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.88x while Bright Scholar Education Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.79x versus 0.21x for Bright Scholar Education Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOMDNomad Foods0.79x 11.88x $846.4M $77.3M BEDUBright Scholar Education Holdings0.21x -- $14.9M -$137.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NOMD or BTI?
British American Tobacco PLC has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58% beat British American Tobacco PLC's return on equity of -22.5%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOMDNomad Foods32.25% $0.48 $5.4B BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC-- -- $119.7B -
What do Analysts Say About NOMD or BTI?
Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 46.28%. On the other hand British American Tobacco PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.49%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than British American Tobacco PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than British American Tobacco PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOMDNomad Foods6 0 0 BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC0 0 0 -
Is NOMD or BTI More Risky?
Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison British American Tobacco PLC has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.993%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOMD or BTI?
Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. British American Tobacco PLC offers a yield of 8.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.74 per share. Nomad Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. British American Tobacco PLC pays out -35.19% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOMD or BTI?
Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $846.4M, which are larger than British American Tobacco PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M is higher than British American Tobacco PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.88x while British American Tobacco PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.79x versus 2.50x for British American Tobacco PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOMDNomad Foods0.79x 11.88x $846.4M $77.3M BTIBritish American Tobacco PLC2.50x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOMD or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58% beat Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's return on equity of 19.35%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOMDNomad Foods32.25% $0.48 $5.4B CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC-- -- $21.9B -
What do Analysts Say About NOMD or CCEP?
Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 46.28%. On the other hand Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has an analysts' consensus of $80.66 which suggests that it could grow by 6.26%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOMDNomad Foods6 0 0 CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC8 3 0 -
Is NOMD or CCEP More Risky?
Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC has a beta of 0.912, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.809%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOMD or CCEP?
Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Nomad Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC pays out 50.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOMD or CCEP?
Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $846.4M, which are larger than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M is higher than Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.88x while Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC's PE ratio is 20.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.79x versus 1.69x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOMDNomad Foods0.79x 11.88x $846.4M $77.3M CCEPCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC1.69x 20.39x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOMD or DEO?
Diageo PLC has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58% beat Diageo PLC's return on equity of 32.7%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOMDNomad Foods32.25% $0.48 $5.4B DEODiageo PLC-- -- $33.6B -
What do Analysts Say About NOMD or DEO?
Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 46.28%. On the other hand Diageo PLC has an analysts' consensus of $135.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.74%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Diageo PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Diageo PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOMDNomad Foods6 0 0 DEODiageo PLC3 2 1 -
Is NOMD or DEO More Risky?
Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diageo PLC has a beta of 0.668, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.176%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOMD or DEO?
Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Diageo PLC offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.52 per share. Nomad Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC pays out 57.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Diageo PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOMD or DEO?
Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $846.4M, which are larger than Diageo PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M is higher than Diageo PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.88x while Diageo PLC's PE ratio is 18.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.79x versus 3.46x for Diageo PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOMDNomad Foods0.79x 11.88x $846.4M $77.3M DEODiageo PLC3.46x 18.39x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NOMD or UL?
Unilever PLC has a net margin of 9.14% compared to Nomad Foods's net margin of --. Nomad Foods's return on equity of 7.58% beat Unilever PLC's return on equity of 30.02%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NOMDNomad Foods32.25% $0.48 $5.4B ULUnilever PLC-- -- $24.7B -
What do Analysts Say About NOMD or UL?
Nomad Foods has a consensus price target of $23.42, signalling upside risk potential of 46.28%. On the other hand Unilever PLC has an analysts' consensus of $66.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.7%. Given that Nomad Foods has higher upside potential than Unilever PLC, analysts believe Nomad Foods is more attractive than Unilever PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NOMDNomad Foods6 0 0 ULUnilever PLC3 0 0 -
Is NOMD or UL More Risky?
Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.792, which suggesting that the stock is 20.787% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unilever PLC has a beta of 0.494, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.558%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NOMD or UL?
Nomad Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.75%. Unilever PLC offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Nomad Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC pays out 67.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Unilever PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NOMD or UL?
Nomad Foods quarterly revenues are $846.4M, which are larger than Unilever PLC quarterly revenues of --. Nomad Foods's net income of $77.3M is higher than Unilever PLC's net income of --. Notably, Nomad Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.88x while Unilever PLC's PE ratio is 20.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nomad Foods is 0.79x versus 2.18x for Unilever PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NOMDNomad Foods0.79x 11.88x $846.4M $77.3M ULUnilever PLC2.18x 20.19x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 7.07% over the past day.
Sell
47
CEG alert for Jan 10
Constellation Energy [CEG] is up 25.15% over the past day.
Sell
8
CRNX alert for Jan 10
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals [CRNX] is down 16.31% over the past day.
