GMPUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of 12.64%. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.41% beat Industria De Diseno Textil SA's return on equity of 32.58%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Industria De Diseno Textil SA has an analysts' consensus of $30.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.62%. Given that Industria De Diseno Textil SA has higher upside potential than Gestamp Automocion, analysts believe Industria De Diseno Textil SA is more attractive than Gestamp Automocion.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Industria De Diseno Textil SA has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.541%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Industria De Diseno Textil SA offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 67.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Industria De Diseno Textil SA pays out 81.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are smaller than Industria De Diseno Textil SA quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $65.8M is lower than Industria De Diseno Textil SA's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.27x while Industria De Diseno Textil SA's PE ratio is 23.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.13x versus 3.64x for Industria De Diseno Textil SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Neinor Homes SA has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of --. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.41% beat Neinor Homes SA's return on equity of 6.63%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Neinor Homes SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Neinor Homes SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Neinor Homes SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Neinor Homes SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Neinor Homes SA offers a yield of 22.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 67.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Neinor Homes SA pays out 183.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Gestamp Automocion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Neinor Homes SA's is not.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Neinor Homes SA quarterly revenues of --. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $65.8M is higher than Neinor Homes SA's net income of --. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.27x while Neinor Homes SA's PE ratio is 14.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.13x versus 1.83x for Neinor Homes SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melia Hotels International SA has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of 4.29%. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.41% beat Melia Hotels International SA's return on equity of 20.52%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melia Hotels International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Melia Hotels International SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Melia Hotels International SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melia Hotels International SA has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.85200000000001%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Melia Hotels International SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 67.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Melia Hotels International SA pays out 18.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Melia Hotels International SA quarterly revenues of $545.9M. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $65.8M is higher than Melia Hotels International SA's net income of $23.4M. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.27x while Melia Hotels International SA's PE ratio is 9.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.13x versus 0.65x for Melia Hotels International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vidrala SA has a net margin of 2.01% compared to Gestamp Automocion's net margin of 23.36%. Gestamp Automocion's return on equity of 6.41% beat Vidrala SA's return on equity of 26.8%.

Gestamp Automocion has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vidrala SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gestamp Automocion has higher upside potential than Vidrala SA, analysts believe Gestamp Automocion is more attractive than Vidrala SA.

Gestamp Automocion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vidrala SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gestamp Automocion has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.5%. Vidrala SA offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. Gestamp Automocion pays 67.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Vidrala SA pays out 58.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gestamp Automocion quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Vidrala SA quarterly revenues of $810.2M. Gestamp Automocion's net income of $65.8M is lower than Vidrala SA's net income of $189.2M. Notably, Gestamp Automocion's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.27x while Vidrala SA's PE ratio is 8.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gestamp Automocion is 0.13x versus 1.37x for Vidrala SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.